One thing have I desired of the LORD, that will I seek after; that I may dwell in the house of the LORD all the days of my life (Psalm 27:4)                 Bayith Ministries

Bayith Home  |  Political Cultural and Social Issues

World Health Organisation
Pandemic Preparedness Treaty and
International Health Regulations Amendments

Articles, Videos, Quotes, Comments

Pandemic Preparedness Treaty   |   International Health Regulations: Amendments   |   UK Column News

Quotes and Comments   |   Letter from a Doctor   |   Summary of Selected Proposed Amendments to IHR

World Health Organisation: Covid-19   |   Health and Nutrition   |   Political Cultural & Social Issues

"According to the WHO, the next round of written and video public participation
in the pandemic treaty will take place on 16-17 June"



Pandemic Preparedness Treaty

PETITION:  Do Not Sign Any WHO Pandemic Treaty Unless it is Approved via Public Referendum

"We want the Government to commit to not signing any international treaty on pandemic prevention and preparedness established by the WHO, unless this is approved through a public referendum.  The WHO is currently preparing an international agreement on pandemic prevention, preparedness and response.  We believe the public must first be furnished with the full ramifications of what and how any pandemic treaty could affect them, and be given a public vote on whether the UK should sign up, before the UK Government signs up to this."

Has the Third World Saved the West from a Perilous Pandemic Treaty?  (01 June 2022)

"The alarming move towards a World Pandemic Treaty, effectively giving the UN's World Health Organisation power over sovereign nations in health emergencies, has received a stunning knockback.  Significantly, the blow was dealt by mainly poorer and developing countries, including many in the Third World, who rebelled against the richest nations rushing through rules that would rob them of a say on what would happen on their own soil.  At the same time, a petition to the British government demanding that a World Pandemic Treaty must be subject to a referendum has received the necessary 100,000 signatures and could now be debated by MPs..."

WHO Pandemic Treaty Would Mean 'The Abolition of Democracy'  (28 May 2022)

"On May 11 German Member of European Parliament (MEP) Christine Anderson delivered a powerful speech against the newly proposed WHO pandemic treaty, warning, 'the abolition of democracy by the global elites continues' ... The push to ratify an international 'pandemic treaty' comes as the media hype recent cases of monkeypox in Europe and the U.S...."

Tell Me, Boris, is the Pandemic Treaty a Step Towards World Government?  (25 May 2022)

"Dear Prime Minister, It's the Davos WEF season and conspiracies about World Government abound.  I have a new one for you ... WHO is proposing a new 'pandemic treaty' to encourage more information sharing in the event of another global health crisis ... If the UK agreed to this, health sovereignty could ... be undermined..."

The So-Called 'World Health Organisation' Must Be Shut Down  (20 May 2022)

"The WHO has prepared a document - they're calling it a 'treaty' - that will award itself centralised power over everything from travel to all societal interactions in every country.  Your government intends to sign up ... Like all professional con-artists, the WHO has a plausible cover-story intended to hide its real intentions.  In their 'treaty' document is a statement declaring [that] their total power over every country on earth will only be 'used' when there is a 'global pandemic'.  Oh, that's alright then, we're supposed to say.  But here's the catch: who do you think gets to decide when there is a 'global pandemic'?  Why, the WHO of course.  What an elegant trap.  Whenever it wishes to, the WHO can 'declare' a 'pandemic' and bingo - they run the world.  If they are given this opportunity, does anyone seriously believe the won't declare a pandemic ASAP?..."

Fight the Pandemic Treaty, This Treason Against Western Civilisation  (18 May 2022)

"Remember our frustrations and fury as we lived through the Government's abdication of power to unelected mandarins and boffins of the scientific advisory body SAGE for some 18 months or more until Boris Johnson finally decided to break free of their shackles last December ... Power was handed over to SAGE's collection of behavioural psychologists and control freaks ...  As for our laughingly described 'free press', its role was to act as outright agents of propaganda ... Well, if the World Pandemic Treaty goes ahead ... then look forward t an international version of SAGE running our lives..."

BITCHUTE:  The Corbett Report: The Global Pandemic Treaty: What You Need to Know  (27 April 2022)

"The WHO has already begun drafting a global pandemic treaty on pandemic preparedness.  What form will it take?  What teeth will it have?  How will it further the globalists in cementing the biosecurity grid into place?  James breaks it down in today's episode of the Corbett Report podcast."

We Told the WHO We Don't Want Its Pandemic Treaty - Now What?  (26 April 2022)

"If the WHO thought it could quietly let its public participation process slip past your attention, it was mistaken ... many grassroots organisations did what they could to spread the world and the World Council for Health's #stopthetreaty campaign reached an astonishing 415 million people.  Many of you made written submissions expressing your concerns.  So many of you in fact, that I hear the WHO's website crashed on the last day ... It is important we make it clear that we do not recognise the WHO as an authority over us and that we will not tolerate this abuse of power.  We are sovereign and will not be bound by the undertakings of corrupt officials who pretend to act on our behalf when signing away the inherent rights of the World's People.  They do not act for us and we will not be bound..."

World Health Organisation Aims for Global Control  (22 April 2022)

"The WHO has launched a plan for a so-called Pandemic Treaty which would give it unprecedented, undemocratic jurisdiction over its 194 member nations, including the UK.  Under the treaty, the WHO could order mandatory vaccines, digital health IDs, lockdowns, isolation, testing regimes, no-jab-no-job rules, or anything else it decided as policy, irrespective of dissenting voices.  If the UK signed up, the Government would lose any sovereign power to decide this country's fate in the event of another pandemic, or other health issues..."

Urgent - My Video Call with the WHO This Morning  (13 April 2022)

"As you may know, the WHO is proposing a global pandemic agreement that would give it undemocratic rights over every participating nation and its citizens ... in the event of a 'pandemic', the WHO's constitution would replace every country's constitution.  Whether your country's elected government would agree or not, the WHO could impose lockdowns, testing regimes, enforce medical interventions, dictate all public health practice, and much more ... On Sunday, it launched a 'public participation process' and invited video and written submissions.  They gave two days to make video submissions, and written submissions must be received by 5pm CEST today.  That's just five days for the world's citizens to have their voices heard ... You have a right to be heard.  Speak up.  Represent yourself, your family, and your loved ones ... there are so many ... ways you can push back..."

We Must Act to #StopTheTreaty  (13 March 2022)

"The World Council for Health has issued an open letter on the WHO's proposed pandemic treaty.  The council opposes this power grab and hopes to draw attention to it during a time when much of the world's attention is narrowly focused on a new, developing crisis ... I encourage you to read the letter in full, familiarise yourself with the pandemic agreement, and join the World Council for Health in taking action to stop it.  The WHO has failed the people of the world time and time again.  The last thing we should do is give them more power..."

First Open Letter on the WHO's Pandemic Treaty  (08 March 2022)

"The WHO aims to confirm the pandemic agreement in the 77th World Health Assembly in 2024, but it could happen much sooner.  World Council for Health will continue to raise awareness through campaigning against this undemocratic move..."

First Open Letter on the WHO's Pandemic Treaty #StopTheTreaty  [PDF Version]  [JPEG Version]  (01 March 2022)

"TO: People throughout the world. Governments, presidents, health ministers. Independent media. WHO. UN:  The World Council for Health, a coalition of scientists, doctors, lawyers and civil society advocacy organizations, opposes the WHO's moves to implement a power grab in the form of a global pandemic agreement ... The proposed WHO agreement is unnecessary, and is a threat to sovereignty and inalienable rights.  It increases the WHO's suffocating power to declare unjustified pandemics, impose dehumanising lockdowns, and enforce expensive, unsafe and ineffective treatments against the will of the people..."

WHO:  World Health Assembly Agrees to Launch Process to Develop Historic Global Accord on Pandemic Prevention, Preparedness and Response  (01 December 2021)

"In a consensus decision aimed at protecting the world from future infectious diseases crises, the World Health Assembly today agreed to kickstart a global process to draft and negotiate a convention, agreement or other international instrument under the Constitution of the WHO to strengthen pandemic prevention, preparedness and response ... Under the decision adopted today, the INB will hold its first meeting by 01 March 2022 (to agree on ways of working and timelines) and its second by 01 August 2022 (to discuss progress on a working draft).  It will also hold public hearings to inform its deliberations; deliver a progress report to the 76th World Health Assembly in 2023; and submit its outcome for consideration by the 77th World health Assembly in 2024..."


International Health Regulations Amendments

Urgent IHR Announcement!  (22 May 2022)

"12 of the 13 amendments to the IHR have been withdrawn ... BUT, we must stay engaged.  We cannot trust them and we cannot rest until the World Health Assembly is over on May 28th and the amendments are thrown in the dust heap of history.  We also know they never give up.  What they don't get on the first try they just keep coming back until they break us down but we will not be broken down this time.  The Treaty is next."

Wake Up and Smell the Burning of Our Constitution  (Updated 20 May 2022)

"Most people have never heard of the International Health Regulations ... The 75th meeting of the World Health Assembly will be held in Geneva, Switzerland this May 22-28, 2022.  The Assembly will vote on the amendments to the IHR.  They are very likely to pass and be enacted into international law unless 'We the People' stand up against this attack on our sovereignty ... These amendments are designed to confuse the member nations into giving away even more of their sovereignty..."

Don't Underestimate the Power of Your Influence  (13 May 2022)

"As mass panic about Covid-19 spread, the WHO could have been a voice of reason ... It has failed.  In a sane world, this failure would be enough to require an international investigation of the WHO and an accounting of its Covid-19 recommendations.  But we all know that sanity, at least in the corridors of so-called power, has long departed.  Instead, the WHO seems to believe it has not done enough, has not wielded enough influence ... it now wants the power to not only call a pandemic, but to call a 'potential or actual health emergency', and then to override the constitutions of sovereign nations to force its disastrous public policies on millions of men, women and children.  This is what is effectively being proposed through amendments to the International Health Regulations, and it is madness ... Member states vote on the IHR amendments in two weeks time..."

#StopTheWHO: How You Can Take a Stand Against IHR Amendments  (10 May 2022)

"In May 2022, WHO intends to amend the International Health regulations to give greater control to itself and Tedros Ghebreyesus, Director-General of WHO.  This pushes our world towards a centralised governance model of worldwide health surveillance, reporting, and management, where the people have no say ... On January 18th 2022, the United States Department of Health and Human Services proposed amendments to the IHR.  These amendments give control over the declaration of a public health emergency in any member state to the WHO Director-General - even over the objection of the member state..."

Open Letter - Oppose Amendments to the IHR This May 2022  (May 2022)

"TO: The People of All Sovereign Nations. WHA Representatives. The WHO and the UN:  These proposed IHR amendments will be voted upon at the next World Health Assembly, which will take place in Geneva, May 22 to 28, 2022 ... Due to the influence of private money at the WHO, a review in the Journal of Integrative Medicine & Therapy stated that the corruption of the WHO is the 'biggest threat to the world's public health of our time.'  This is particularly true in relation to WHO drug recommendations ... it is unknown WHA delegates who get to make decisions for us ... the secretive list of each country's delegates has not been published ... Given consistent evidence that WHO is heavily conflicted and controlled by various industries, its usefulness as a guide to public health must be critically re-evaluated..."


UK Column News

UK Column News  (20 May 2022)

WHO treaty and IHR amendments (02:12-09:43)


Quotes and Comments

WHO Pandemic Preparedness Treaty

"The treaty will be discussed and voted upon at the World Health Assembly in 2023, with a view to introduction in 2024.  It can be passed on a majority - and, if adopted, all member countries would be bound by it.  Democratic processes could therefore be over-ridden by the WHO, an organisation part-funded and influenced by unelected parties ... The treaty also carries a further threat to freedom of speech, as it would give the WHO the power to censor health information worldwide.  In other words, whatever the WHO decided was The Science would be deemed 'information'.  Any questioning voice, any debate, any alternative view, however erudite and qualified, would be 'misinformation' and hidden from the Public.  It is a template that has been well-trialled over the past two years"

"According to the WHO, the next round of written and video public participation in the pandemic treaty will take place on 16-17 June"

"All who oppose the dictatorial proposed 'treaty' from the WHO should put their MPs on notice that any policy which emerges by a British government in submission to such a treaty must be dismissed and disobeyed on democratic grounds.  Not only have we not voted for a return of these unnecessary and suppressive measures, we have no mechanism for expressing OUR view of these proposals.  I will inform my MP therefore that I will reject them outright and disregard them as arbitrary and undemocratic.  It is the duty of every voter NOT to comply with a further failed and dangerous policy that has already wreaked such national and personal damage to people's lives"
[reader's comment at source].

"Throughout this [covid] pandemic, the WHO has demonstrated its incompetence...  It has withheld safe and established older medicines, ignored the experiences of frontline doctors, disregarded evidence from low, middle and high-income countries and taken no heed of the values and preferences of people affected by their recommendations.  It has ignored the huge numbers of adverse reactions [to the vaccines] on its own database and has failed to issue warnings about the gene-based vaccines.  It has also advertised that the mRNA vaccines are as safe as normal vaccines - and this is simply not the case.  No one in their right mind would want the WHO in charge of a global pandemic.  And yet, that's precisely what it is proposing with its global pandemic treaty"
[Dr. Tess Lawrie, World Council for Health, quoted at source].

"They've convinced the public through propaganda to believe that a sore throat, achy joints, and fatigue are completely unacceptable.  With the same propaganda they convinced the public to believe that heart attacks, strokes, blood clots and die suddenly are acceptable.  This is the power of mind control, brainwashing, and propaganda"
[comment at source].

"They will enforce a global digital ID, which will serve as a vaccine passport, wallet for their digital currency, and identification.  It will be a QR Code, only visible under ultraviolet light. They will force this Mark globally, and everyone who refuses will not be able to buy/sell.  This is what the Bible called the Mark of the Beast, in Revelation 13, and everyone who accepts it, will be cast into the Lake of Fire on judgment day
" [comment at source].

"This globalist 'treaty' is an effective suicide note for every 'free' country that signs it.  The mere idea that elected politicians will sign away the last shreds of our freedoms to a mob of privately-funded international gangsters shows what a degraded facade our democracy has become.  Why on earth should any country sign any deal with the unelected drug-money brokers that bankroll the WHO?  The WHO spent the first weeks of the Covid fiasco fanning the flames of global hysteria with apocalyptic warnings and predictions as the pre-sales push for the vaccine-bonanza to come ... It goes without saying that the true nature of this preposterous globalist power-grab is not being mentioned - and nor will it be.  This is not some paranoid dark-web theory about a trifling, meaningless document that doesn't really matter: it's real, it's now and it's happening.  Resist and refuse"

International Health Regulations Amendments

"Please also be aware of the proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations, to be voted on this May at the World Health Assembly.  Like the pandemic treaty, this is another move to seize greater powers and override the sovereign laws of individual nations.  Some say this is more significant than the pandemic treaty: if voted in, it means the loss of our sovereignty from this November" [source].

"The World Council for Health opposes the unnecessary and dystopian move towards centralized control of public health.  This proven harmful model assumes that only one entity, WHO, understands how to manage the health policy of every state - and by implication, the health of each and every individual.  It also assumes, incorrectly, that Big Pharma's controversial model of medicine - which is the WHO's preferred model - is the expert guide to better health and wellness"


Letter from a Doctor

Professor Robert Clancy, AM, FRS(N), MB, BS, BSc(Med), PhD, DSc, FRACP, FRCP(A), FRCP(C)

"The proposal to take control of pandemics at a central WHO level is untenable and threatens a global society.  I am in receipt of the World Council for Health response [to the Pandemic treaty], and the superbly summarised view by Dr Tess Lawrie.  These concerns reflect the 'across the board' view of most Australian doctors; certainly, those who have closely monitored control of the Covid Pandemic, and have been largely disenfranchised by bureaucratic decision makers, with little to no understanding of the disease and critical issues modulating clinical outcomes.  The failure to understand the restrictions of systemic vaccination for mucosal infection and the dangers of accumulated suppression that follows mindless booster programmes, and failure to interrogate the massive databases regarding adverse events of genetic vaccines are but two of the serious mistakes perpetuated by the WHO.

"My fears regarding the WHO taking the mantle regarding pandemic control start with those issues identified by Tess Lawrie.  It is foolhardy to even suggest that a 'one size fits all' response to a pandemic crisis across geographic zones characterised by hugely different parameters, could possibly be covered by a central bureaucratic process - the need for local decision making is of prime importance.  The rule of science and the rule of the doctor-patient relationship must determine any response to a pandemic, and current experience where the rule of the narrative has so distorted disease outcome - supported by the WHO - must make very clear the foolishness of rewarding incompetence and corruption with even greater powers.

"I write this as the most experienced Clinical Immunologist in Australia, and a leading research scientist in Mucosal Immunology with a focus on 'host-parasite relationship'" [source].


Summary of Selected Proposed Amendments to IHR

The WHO intends to amend 13 IHR articles: 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, 18, 48, 49, 53, 59

"Increased Surveillance:  Under Article 5, the WHO will develop early warning criteria that will allow it to establish a risk assessment for a member state, which means that it can use the type of modeling, simulation, and predictions that exaggerated the risk from Covid-19 over two years ago.  Once the WHO creates its assessment, it will communicate it to inter-governmental organizations and other member states.

"48-Hour Deadline:  Under Articles 6, 10, 11, and 13, a member state is given 48 hours to respond to a WHO risk assessment and accept or reject on-site assistance.  However, in practice, this timeline can be reduced to hours, forcing it to comply or face international disapproval [led] by the WHO and potentially unfriendly member states.

"Secret Sources:  Under Article 9, the WHO can rely on undisclosed sources for information leading it to declare a public health emergency.  Those sources could include Big Pharma, WHO funders such as the Gates Foundations and the Gates-founded-and-funded GAVI Alliance, as well as others seeking to monopolize power.

"Weakened Sovereignty:  Under Article 12, when the WHO receives undisclosed information concerning a purported public health threat in a member state, the Director-General may (not must) consult with the WHO Emergency Committee and the member state.  However, s/he can unilaterally declare a potential or actual public health emergency of international concern.  The Director-General's authority replaces national sovereign authority.  This can later be used to enforce sanctions on nations.

"Rejecting the Amendments:  Under Article 59, after the amendments are adopted by the World Health Assembly, a member state has six months to reject them.  This means November, this year.  If the member state fails to act, it will be deemed to have accepted the amendments in full.  Any rejection or reservation received by the Director-General after the expiry of that period shall have no force and effect" [source].






"He that dwelleth in the secret place of the most High shall abide under the shadow of the Almighty.
I will say of the LORD, He is my refuge and my fortress: my God; in Him will I trust.
Surely He shall deliver thee from the snare of the fowler, and from the noisome pestilence.
He shall cover thee with His feathers, and under His wings shalt thou trust:
His truth shall be thy shield and buckler.
Thou shalt not be afraid for the terror by night; nor for the arrow that flieth by day;
Nor for the pestilence that walketh in darkness; nor for the destruction that wasteth at noonday ...
He shall give His angels charge over thee, to keep thee in all thy ways ...
he shall call upon me, and I will answer him: I will be with him in trouble ... and show him my salvation"
(Psalm 91)



We recommend the articles, videos and books/DVDs etc we have included on this page, but please note that we would not necessarily agree with every single word contained therein; neither can we necessarily vouch for the websites or periodicals from which these articles are taken, or any other articles or materials by the same authors, or any groups or ministries or websites with which they may be associated, or the beliefs of whatever kind they may hold, or any other aspect of their work or ministry or position.  Likewise, our recommendation here of specific websites/pages does not necessarily imply that we endorse every aspect of that group or ministry.

Elizabeth McDonald