Bayith Home | Political Cultural and Social Issues | Political Correctness: Index of Topics | Islam: Index of Topics
Cultural Marxism's "Long March Through The Institutions" of Western Civilisation
"I saw the
revolutionary destruction of Society as the one and only solution.
A worldwide overturning of values cannot take place without the annihilation of the old values
and the creation of new ones by the revolutionaries"
[George Lukacs, The Frankfurt School]
The Rape Jihad
The Islamic Traditions of Razzia, Taharrush, and Sex Slavery
Comments and Quotations
The Migrants' Rape Jihad | Cologne et al New Years' Eve 2015/16 | Taharrush Jama'i
The Elites' Contempt for Western Women | The Children | Rotherham, Rochdale, et al Rape Gangs
The Three Monkeys | A Word to the Feminists | The 'Humanitarian' Left | Europe's Rape Epidemic
Malsi-Tung | Identity Politics | The Burden Which Habakkuk the Prophet Saw | The Frankfurt School
The Rape Jihad: Articles | Rotherham et al Rape Jihad: Quotes | The EU Migrant Crisis | Multiculturalism, Immigration, Racism
Islamic Tradition of Razzia | PEGIDA | The Religion of Peace | The Gates of Vienna | Political Islam | Migrant Crisis
"It is impossible but that offenses will come: but woe unto him, through whom they come! It were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and he cast into the sea, than that he should offend one of these little ones" (The Holy Bible, Luke 17:1-2)
Western Leaders/Politicians, Mainstream Media, Liberals, Feminists, No Borders Activists, Police Forces, Social Services...
The following extended extract is from the article: The Koranic Rape Epidemic and Silence
"The migrants are young males who were raised on the Koran, from childhood on up, which teaches without ambiguity that women are inferior and that their own supremacy should be affirmed through violence, first to the little girl, then to the wife ... Mohammed also told them that non followers of Islam were 'kaffir' and their women were 'whores' ... How would they view the 30 year old British woman who is dedicating herself to helping them? ... not only bring[ing] them food, clothing, cell phones, etc, but verbal and emotional support. Surely they would see that she is on their side, especially when it came time to helping plot how to outsmart the police and make it, illegally, into either her country, or to other countries that have enticed them with free money. Her European appearance was visibly different from the men and her purpose was to help them without respect to difference in appearance, nationality, or beliefs ...
"One Saturday night answered this question for her and us, and forever changed the European woman's life, but for the Islamic males, it would be just another Saturday night in Europe. As the music played loudly at a nearby park, the woman walked freely among the migrants she had thus served, day by day, and night by night, befriending them, enhancing the quality of their lives, and for them, affirming their own superiority, when a group of them cornered her near the showers she and her group had set up for them. To them, she was not only 'woman' but 'kaffir', that is, 'unclean', beneath the status of a dog; and not wearing the veil, and they, as a group, acted according to what the Koran told them: They violently gang raped her, one after the other ... In the clash of ideologies, one of 'no borders, no nations, no racist deportations' and the dedication to serving the man, and the other of 'you are supreme, and the woman is kaffir, take what your right hand finds' supremacy and prescribed rape, the brutality prevailed ...
"When they finished with her, she went to report the crime when she was met by her colleagues, ... who told her that if she told what had happened, it would damage 'their cause' and dreams of a world without borders, nations, ... Like John Lennon singing, 'imagine no possessions' while having a refrigerated closet for for his mink coats, the irony stood out starkly to the victim: The one compulsion that every rape victim shares is to be heard and not silenced. The one mandate from all of the utopian [Liberals] is to enforce the cause by all means. Which drive was more powerful? Would it be the cause of ultimate socialism, where even lying with statistics is done to protect Islam? Or, would the bare basic but powerful need to be heard from one so horribly violated prevail?
"They choked her into silence by their bullying tactics, which is to enforce Sharia blasphemy laws over her own God given instinct to cry out for justice ...
"Finally, the urge to be heard won the contest of the wills, and she reported the gang rape at the hands of migrant Islamist [sic] supremacists from Africa. What her colleagues did next was unthinkable but quite predictable. ... It was unthinkable because of the severity of its cruelty, coming, at least seemingly, from those who consider themselves 'humanitarians'. It was predictable because we have learned: the narrative trumps the truth. ... They openly accused her of making the criminal report of gang rape out of 'spite'.
"What is a 'spite report' of rape? Her colleagues re-victimised her, or 'raped her' all over again. ... She, and everyone who loves her, will suffer for the rest of their days. The rapists? They simply did what their religion tells them."
[End of Extract]
The following extended extract is from the article: Europe's Rape Epidemic: Western Women Will be Sacrificed at the Altar of Mass Migration
“Sweden has become Europe’s rape capital. Its government has blamed this on everything from increased reporting to the internet to the weather.
Norway and Denmark also have some rather alarming rates of rape, but those countries are more readily willing to admit the cause. In Norway, recent statistics revealed that 100% of violent street-rapes committed in the capital city of Oslo were committed by ‘non-western’ immigrants. It’s a similar story in Denmark, where the majority of rapes are committed by immigrants, usually Muslim.
In England, it’s been rape after rape – tens of thousands of young British girls are brutalised, tortured, beaten and raped by organised gangs comprised almost exclusively of Muslims.
And now we have Germany. When Chancellor Merkel threw open the doors of her country to hundreds of thousands of migrants from the Middle East and Africa, she opened the door to the rape of German women. Rape and sexual assault (as well as forced prostitution) is rampant within the refugee camps in Germany, and it has spilled out to the nearby towns. Rape in Germany has already been described as an ‘epidemic’ and one that the German authorities, and media, are keeping rather quiet about. The reality is that German authorities, who know that many of these asylum seekers are rapists, will allow those men to live freely among German women – they have decided to allow German women to be raped, just like authorities all over Europe.
Women of Europe must understand what is happening here. … This is a truly brutal hatred of women that demands we are slaves and absolutely believes it has the right to rape women who don’t submit. The men think of women this way because that is where they come from, that is what they know.
Reports reveal that the bulk of ‘asylum seekers’ now piling in to Europe are from countries including Pakistan, Somalia, Afghanistan, and other places where women are treated appallingly as a matter of course. It’s not the ‘extreme fringe’ or a ‘tiny minority’; it is the norm, the mainstream, and the law of the land.
It’s true, women are abused everywhere, but in most countries it’s against the law. In Islamic states, it is the law.
Many of the men on their way to Europe were raised, as in Pakistan, to believe that a woman who isn’t all-but invisible is asking to be raped. On the legal books in Pakistan, a woman can be stoned to death for being a victim of rape. What on earth do we expect from the bulk of men who grow up under these rules? How will they view women, and rape? And what on earth do we expect to happen when they come en masse to Europe? They will suddenly become feminists en route? No, they bring this misogyny with them, and it’s a misogyny that Europe’s women are about to become very familiar with. Migrants leave behind many things when they leave their country. Their beliefs are not among them”
[End of Extract]
The following is an extended extract from the blog article: What is Malsi-Tung?
"The nature of this mentality is very difficult to pin down. It is the product of many different social currents: liberalism; social liberalism; socialism; Christianity in its more non-conformist manifestations; Marxism; Progressivism; Political Correctness. People are committed in varying degrees to the features of this mentality ... they will tend to be suspicious of patriotic sentiments, seeing these as a way of excluding outsiders ... they will tend to be very solicitous of the needs of immigrants and minorities; they will tend to take the side of 'the other' rather than straightforwardly supporting the 'home team'; they will tend to be less suspicious of foreign powers and assume that all people are fundamentally motivated by the same generosity of spirit as themselves ... readily amalgamated with self-guilt and cultural self-denunciation. ...
"This utopian and naive mentality is now opening the gates of the city, metaphorically speaking, to the forces of Islam, a long-standing, powerful, relentless, and poorly understood social movement of enormous brutality. Deaf to the cries of those who know more about this movement, the details of its ideology and its historical record, they seek to silence these voices as the remnants of an out-dated, backward-looking mentality of bigotry and distrust. Simply be nicer to everyone and all will be well, they say.
"Malsi-Tung is the name I use to denote the interweaving of ... on the one hand Islam, which has well-documented, historically proven, and theologically grounded aspirations for global domination under Sharia; and Left/Liberal/Progressivism, a difficult-to-name and hard-to-classify set of beliefs, attitudes, assumptions, values and prejudices which are forming a deadly embrace with the wholly antithetical culture of Islam. These two forces ... are driving the world towards a new dark age characterised by things which the Liberal/Progressive world claims endlessly to be against, but against which apparently it is unwilling to offer any resistance, indeed it seems destined to hasten their progress. ...
"There is no word for this mentality so I have called it malsi-tung. Those afflicted with it I refer to as Malisites.
"The most despicable aspect of Malisites today is their pre-emptive surrender to Islam, a phenomenon they do not even bother to subject to serious enquiry. Basing their views on utopian assumptions instead of well-documented facts, they do everything in their power to smooth the path for this alien and cruel culture. If we do manage to avoid the descent into a New Islamic Dark Age, the part played by the Malisites will forever be remembered as one of the vilest in history"
[End of Extract]
"There is absolutely no difference between [Islam and European Fascist-Marxism]. ... European culture has been gutted by Post-Modern 'victim'-obsessed PC indoctrination which has already warped the minds of the young" [comment at: source].
The following is an extended extract from the article: The Origin of 'Identity Politics' & 'Political Correctness'
"Identity politics (sometimes dubbed 'political correctness') is the result of a political-Left major backlash against the mass of ordinary people (in Europe and 'the West'), beginning in the 1920s/30s, in the wake of the persistent failure of Marxist theory to be realised in European 'revolution' or any real change through democracy. In shifting the blame away from Marxist theory and those gullible enough to adhere to it, and on to those the theory had prescribed and predicted would have been the beneficiaries, if only they had responded accordingly ('the [white, male] workers'); then the cognitive-dissonance within the political-left mindset caused by this crisis to an extent was salved"
"As with any fervent ideology, a hallmark of the political-Left is interpreting anything and everything in its own ideological terms to claim as a manifestation of the ideology and its prophecy - jumping on a bandwagon, so to speak; though here only to hijack it. The bandwagon here was, of course, the American civil rights movement, which though enjoying ubiquitous support within black communities - to the point often of various forms of extremism - featured virtually nil endorsement of socialism ... It is from the time of this co-option that 'identity politics' dates; many considering that the movement was incorporated into the Left in the wake of King's assassination in 1968 - the major turning-point year in political-Left politics generally"
"'Civil rights', as the first great 'single-issue' campaign, served not least to provide an acceptable cloak for the Left to avoid provoking a resurgence of McCarthysim. The major social upheaval of 'civil rights' with its large-scale and widespread rioting was easily the nearest thing in then recent US history to look like the promised Marxist 'revolution', and obviously was just the practical application the 'theory' was seeking. Moreover, the protagonists (black Americans) were eminently separable form the now despised 'workers' per se, in being presentable as a new 'group; from outside of the former fray of 'boss' versus 'worker'."
"This accident of history served to add 'black' to 'woman' as 'the new oppressed' ... 'The worker' in effect was retrospectively stereotyped as both 'man' and 'white'. With the inverse of this stereotype of 'white' being not just 'black American' but 'black' - that is, ethnic-minority generically ... so it was that the new 'agents of social change' / 'disadvantaged' / 'oppressed' were extended from women to also include all ethnic minorities"
"It is only with the knowledge of how this developed that sense can be made of why ethnicity is held above the myriad other possible differences that could be utilised as in-group markers, when in fact there is nothing inherent in ethnicity as an in-group marker to produce inter-group prejudice that is particularly more pernicious"
"Indeed, the worst inter-communal conflicts nominally between different ethnicities usually are between different cultural heritages with no discernible 'racial' differences of any kind - and what (non-ethnic) differences there are can be minimal; the lack of contrast actually fuelling the intensity of conflict, such is the need for groups to feel distinguished from each other"
"Furthermore, ethnic prejudice is anything but restricted to or even predominantly 'white' on 'black': inter-ethnic (eg, 'black' on Asian) and ethnic-on-'white' 'racism' can be, often is and may usually be the greater problem; and a negative attitude to a certain ethnicity does not imply a similar attitude to other ethnicities"
"The specific US experience, given the highly divisive politics in the wake of the American Civil War over the basis of the Southern US economy in African slavery, does not translate to elsewhere; notably not to Europe - as was starkly evidenced in the experience of World War II 'black' American GIs stationed in England in how they were favourably received by locals, who sided with them when discriminated against"
"'Racial divides' in European 'white' host countries are the result not of mutual antipathy but affiliative forces, principally within migrant enclaves and secondarily within the 'host' community; in both cases being through in-group 'love', not out-group 'hate'"
[EMcD: though the latter part of this observation is indeed true in normal circumstances, this does not, of course, take account of the Islamic/Koranic doctrines of Al-Hijra (Immigration), Taqiyya (Lying and Deceit), and Razzia/Ghazwa (Rape and Slavery), Dawa (Cultural and Stealth Jihad), and Terrorist and Violent Jihad, carried out by fundamentalist Muslims as they settle in increasing numbers in Western countries with the sole and deliberate purpose of making every remaining Dar al-Harb ('house of war': i.e. any non-Muslim country) into a Dar al-Islam ('house of submission': i.e all Muslim countries) until Islam finally achieves its longed-for global Caliphate.]
[End of Extract]
The righteous cry out for God's punishment of the injustice in their
The LORD God answers:
The dismay of the
righteous at God's answer:
The LORD God's reassurance to
"The Frankfurt School believed that as long as an individual had the belief - or even the hope of belief - that his divine gift of reason could solve the problems facing society, then that society would never reach the state of hopelessness and alienation that they considered necessary to provoke socialist revolution.
Their task, therefore, was as swiftly as possible to undermine the Judaeo-Christian legacy. To do this they called for the most negative destructive criticism possible of every sphere of life which would be designed to de-stabilize society and bring down what they saw as the 'oppressive' order. Their policies, they hoped, would spread like a virus - 'continuing the work of Western Marxists by other means' as one of their members noted.
To further the advance of their 'quiet' cultural revolution ... the [Frankfurt] School recommended (among other things):
(1) the creation of racism
One of the main ideas of the Frankfurt School was to exploit Freud's idea of 'pansexualism' - the search for pleasure, the exploitation of the differences between the sexes, the overthrowing of traditional relationships between men and women. To further their aims they would:
the authority of the father, deny the specific roles of father and
mother, and wrest away from families their rights as primary
educators of their children,
"Woe unto them that call evil
good, and good evil;
"Why do the heathen
rage, and the people imagine a vain thing?
"Many shall be purified, and made white, and tried;