General Quotes and Comments
"Liberal thought in the best sense,
whatever its limitations, must be credited with the remarkable
achievement of creating societies capable of combining social order
with a high degree of personal freedom. This really is a huge
achievement and is too readily dismissed by those of a more utopian
cast of mind. It has led to the creation of societies with a high
degree of compassion, a fact which the utopians are far too ready to
dismiss. There is no word for [the mentality of the utopians] so I
have called it malsi-tung. Those afflicted with it I refer to
as Malisites" [source].
"[T]he left is governed by the
Manichean belief that everything not the left is the right; that the
left is the embodiment of virtue; and that the right is therefore
irredeemably evil" [source].
"An extremely effective tactic of the
Far Left is to call themselves 'centre left', and to label anyone
who opposes or disagrees with them even slightly as 'right wing'. I
should remind you that most if not all of [our] views and policies
were regarded as common sense just 30 short years ago"
"It is undeniable that the Left is a
great success in the United States and throughout Europe: from
rebelling boomers who instigated the age of Aquarius to today's
teenagers who wear Che Guevara tee-shirts, a large number of people
identify themselves with the Left and accept unquestioningly its
caricature of the Right" [from a review of the book, The Left is
Seldom Right, by The Discriminate Thinker].
"Leftists hate the world around them
and want to change it: the people in it most particularly.
Conservatives just want to be left alone to make their own decisions
and follow their own values" [source].
"Because their beliefs serve their
ego rather than reality, Leftists just KNOW what is good for us.
Conservatives need evidence" [source].
"Politics is the only thing Leftists
know about. They know nothing of economics, history or business.
Their only expertise is in promoting feelings of grievance"
"At the core of liberalism is the
spoiled child - miserable, as all spoiled children are, unsatisfied,
demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic, and useless. Liberalism is a
philosophy of snivelling brats"
"Message to Leftists: Even if you
killed all conservatives tomorrow, you would just end up in another
Soviet Union. Conservatives are all that stand between you and that
dismal fate" [source].
"The left-wing Politically Correct
indoctrination that has enabled these shameful events means one
thing and one thing only: By deliberately ignoring crimes against
humanity and subsequently seeking to disguise these crimes, the
liberal/left have lost their very own humanity, along with their
morals and their souls. ... Despite facilitating genuine evil and
wickedness their prime concern is to ... seek to halt the rise of
what they term the 'right wing' ... But ... [the right] are rising
only because the public are awakening to the results of all that the
liberal left stands for. ... Betraying your country via mass
immigration and Multiculturalism is bad enough, but to betray, and
to continue to betray your own children is simply a step beyond the
comprehension of all decent people, and no amount of liberal/left
propaganda and evasion can alter this one simple fact. For the first
time in a very long time I feel deeply ashamed to be part of a
country that you, the liberal left have produced" [source].
"Indeed, it is a sign of just how
intransigent the Left has become that even when approaching an issue
such as abortion, it does not begin by asking what stance is morally
valid or illegitimate, but rather it starts by asking what is Left
or Right" [source].
"It isn't so much that liberals are ignorant. It's just that they
know so many things that aren't so"
"It is not for nothing that George
Orwell had to invent terms like 'double-think' and 'double-speak' to
describe the universe totalitarians created. Those who have watched
the left as long as I have, understand the impossible task that
progressives confront in conducting their crusades. Rhetorically,
they are passionate proponents of 'equality' but in practice they
are committed enthusiasts of a hierarchy of privilege in which the
highest ranks are reserved for themselves as the guardians of
righteousness, and then for those they designate 'victims' and
'oppressed', who are thus worthy of their redemption. Rhetorically
they are secularists and avatars of tolerance, but in fact they are
religious fanatics who regards their opponents as sinners and
miscreants and agents of civil darkness. Therefore, when they engage
an opponent it is rarely to examine and refute his argument but
rather to destroy the bearer of the argument and remove him from the
plain of battle. Consequently, misrepresentation of facts,
distortion of motives and general acts of character assassination
are the preferred modes of progressive discourse, as any
conservative who as acquired a public persona can attest. ...
Efforts by the targets of this malevolence to correct fabrication
and mis-statements of fact are guaranteed to fail nearly every time,
in part because progressives don't regard their judgements as
opinions but as received moral (and therefore incontrovertible)
truth. Eventually an alternative reality is created by this process
which no one would even think to check"
[David Horowitz, The
Surreal World of the Progressive Left at
"The use of the term 'anti fascist' is a clever poly by the extreme
left. It allows them to avoid stating what they really believe in
(most of them don't really know what they believe in or are middle
class pseudo commies). When you are lucky enough to come across one
of these hate filled hypocrites avoid the temptation to stoop to
their level and try asking them what they actually believe in. They
are all very vocal about what they hate, (fascism, racism,
capitalism etc) but most of them will struggle to even define what
any of those concepts actually are and they rarely want to state
what they actually believe in. ... Most of them have no
understanding of politics, economics, or life beyond what you would
expect of the average sixth form student. Their beliefs (if they
have any) are based on emotion and not fact. They are hypocrites and
fools are being used and mislead"
"Even though we are greeted every day
with countless stories of 'political correctness gone mad' we tend
to dismiss them as solitary or silly. But the reality is that they
fit into a bigger picture, a coherent Left-wing agenda" [Jonah
Goldberg, Daily Mail, 04 January 2009].
"The loss of Mr Greaves, a
68-year-old grandfather, has left a great dark gap in the lives of
many people who loved, liked or respected him. But it is the manner
of his death that ought to wake a feeling of alarm - and shame - in
the minds of those who have subjected this country to a vast,
50-year liberal experiment. We were going to be so enlightened and
progressive that we would no longer have to be good. Authority,
punishment, morality, self- discipline, patience, thrift, religion
were all deemed to be outdated and unnecessary, not to mention
repressive, backward and unfit for this wondrous new century. It
was, of course, a terrible mistake, though none of those responsible
will admit it, so it goes on and on. And now we can live in a
country where an organist can meet a violent end on his way to to a
Christmas service, and the police an explain such an incident as 'a
robbery gone wrong'. Who thought of this idiotic, insulting phrase?
Do our modern non-judgmental police think there is ever a robbery
that goes right? The trouble is that they probably do"
[Peter Hitchens, Mail on Sunday, 30 December 2012].
"The Liberal Elite normally prefer to
ignore me as if I were a bad smell. ... [But] Mrs Vince Cable ...
wrote to criticise my article about how cultural revolution and mass
migration have destroyed this country we used to know. She accused
me of nostalgia for the Fifties, and argued that independent-minded
individuals could flourish without the married family. She claimed
we need mass immigration, and that a property tax would narrow the
gap between rich and poor. First, ... I don't want the past back. I
just think we chose the wrong future. The best way of bridging the
gap between rich and poor would be to rebuild the old middle class,
open to all with talent. But it has been squeezed half to death by
confiscatory tax, an expanding State and by the destruction of the
grammar schools - like the one her husband went to. It is in
childhood that the stable married family promotes private life,
allowing one generation to pass on its morals, faith, language and
traditions to the next. These days most children are swiftly
indoctrinated either by the TV or by the State, ... As for her idea
that we 'need' the skills of migrants, who does she mean by 'we'?
Certainly not the British-born people priced out of work by
newcomers. If Britain does need these skills, then why can't it
impart them to the millions of young people already living here, now
idle on benefits? Could it be because of the disastrous failure of
comprehensive education, evident to almost every thinking person in
the country, except for politicians like her husband?"
[Peter Hitchens, Mail on Sunday, 30 December 2012].
"Whatever he was, Enoch Powell could
not have been a collaborator with Hitler, nor could he have been
part of a government that rounded up Jews and sent them to certain
death in National Socialist concentration camps. He actively hated
Neville Chamberlain's policy of making concessions to Hitler, and
joined up to fight in 1939 as soon as he could. But modern Leftists,
who like to insinuate that all conservatives are Nazis at root,
can't understand that. I think this must be why the author C.J.
Sansom thought he could get away with portraying Powell as a Nazi
collaborator in his new thriller Dominion. It's all very well making
up historical episodes that never happened but might have done. But
if you bend the truth too far, you actually betray your craft.
Actually, many prominent Left-wing people in British public life did
collaborate with Stalin's communist tyranny. If I ever take to
writing thrillers, I could have a lot of fun - and stay within the
bounds of truth - by talking their actions to their logical
conclusion. In the meantime, I suggest that Mr Sansom says sorry to
Mr Powell's family for this babyish, historically illiterate slur,
before the book goes into paperback"
[Peter Hitchens, Mail on Sunday,
13 January 2013].
"It's amazing how the left hold
non-whites to a much lower standard than whites. It's so patronizing
and racist but they don't get it. If a white guy committed the kind
of violent acts of terrorism that Neo-Marxist Nelson Mandela
committed you'd never hear the end of it"
"A great tidal wave of syrup swept
across the surface of Earth as soon as the death of Nelson Mandela
was announced. ... He chose to adopt the path of violence. he did
not have to. Apartheid South Africa was a political and moral slum,
but many fought it without resorting to gun or bomb. ... The ANC was
dominated at every level by the South African Communist Party, the
most rigidly Stalinist movement outside North Korea, and grovelling
supporters of Kremlin repression. This is the real point of the
whole exaggerated Mandela cult. Anyone looking at the world in the
second half of the 20th Century could see that the harshest and
cruellest regimes on the planet were Left-wing ones, in Moscow,
Peking and Havana. But the fashionable Western left will never admit
that. They are interested only in 'Right-wing' repression and
secretly think that Left-wing oppression might actually be
justified. That is why there was nothing like this fuss on the death
of another giant of human liberation, Alexander Solzhenitsyn.
Solzhenitsyn was at least as great as Mandela - and, in my view,
greater. He never wielded anything more deadly than a typewriter,
yet he brought down an Evil Empire, with all its concentration
camps, tanks, guns and bombs. But when he died in August 2008, I
don't recall hours of eulogies on the BBC, or his face on every
front page. Ask yourselves why"
[Peter Hitchens, Mail on Sunday,
08 December 2013].
"Ed Miliband jumped on Alex Salmond's
bandwagon and offered votes to 16-year-olds. He does this because at
that age most minds remain half-formed, and therefore it is highly
likely that their owners will vote for a party with joke policies
run by charlatans. I've never been convinced by the arguments that
led to the reduction in voting age from 21 to 18 in 1967. If you are
going to give the vote to children, then, frankly, don't complain if
you get politicians with childish policies"
[Simon Heffer, Daily
Mail, 27 September 2014].
"There is a joke: the definition of a
racist is someone who is winning an argument with a liberal. ...
There are essentially two reasons the left use this insult. Firstly,
as they lose the argument on immigration, they must shift the debate
from facts to morality. Secondly, racism is such a damaging
accusation that even when untrue, it can do great harm to opponents.
... Leftists do not live in a reality-based world. They live in a
world of ideology and theory and 'wouldn't it be nice if'. As
a result, they tend to be very uncomfortable with arguments that
revolve around observable fact. In debates about immigration they
ideologically believe that immigration is good. But when they are
shown the facts about the negative impact of mass immigration, they
become defensive. Leftists rarely win arguments based on the facts,
as facts are not their currency of choice. Instead, they focus on
the alleged moral failings of their opponent"
Barrowford Primary School, Lancashire:
"More social engineering from [no
doubt] a 'right-on' leftie head" / "Which
hippy commune did the head[mistress] escape from and who gave her
the job?" / "There's the answer why the
system has fallen to pieces and teachers have lost control in the
classroom, this person has officially handed over everything a
teacher represents and put the kids in charge, another left wing
idiot far removed from the real world let [loose] as a teacher"
"When they hit the workplace or
anywhere other than a hippy commune they will be screwed. It's the
looney left at its worst" / "I'm hoping the
good burghers of Barrowford are slightly more switched on to reality
than the Trendy Left of Hampstead and remove their children from
this very abusive environment before the poor mites are damaged
beyond repair. Thus the next generation of moronic social engineers
is created" [comments at
The Left-Right Paradigm
The following extract is taken
from the article:
The Left-Right Paradigm and the New World Order
"On the Right: we have
faux-Conservatives - nothing more than Crony
Capitalists/Corporatists. The 'Conservatives' represent big
business, especially Globalist interests; the military industrial
complex; the finance industry; aristocratic and old wealth (eg the
Rothschilds); and foreign billionaires.
"They represent controlling and
subjugating the masses, and preserving power in the hands of a small
corrupt supranational elite.
"On the Left: we have
faux-Liberals - nothing more than Cultural Marxists who have long
since destroyed Classical Liberalism. The 'Liberals' represent
all totalitarian and unelected bodies of power and sources of wealth
and micro-management and control of people through the Unions; the
EUSSR; ever-enlarging NGOs, Charities, and Voluntary sector; and
ever-increasing Government at every level.
"They represent controlling and
subjugating the masses, and preserving power in the hands of a small
corrupt supranational elite.
"The Left-Right paradigm makes less
and less sense ... It is controlled and given to us by academia,
which has been almost completely controlled for generations by
Leftist leaning academics, who give us a spectrum which they say has
on the Far Right: monarchies, oligarchies, crony capitalists,
radical Islam, Christian Fundamentalists, Neo-Nazis, and Fascists of
all stripes... but on the Far Left: Communism... It seems
somewhat unbalanced. All those listed as 'Far Right' seem very
different to one another.
"A better way to understand it is
that it is not simply a Left-Right scale, but ... also an Up-Down
scale: It is Collectivism verses Individualism. Or, Big
State verses Small Government. It can mean believing
that the State knows best and has a right to tell you what to do and
interfere in your life verses believing that the ultimate way
of determining how successful a country is is by how small the
Government can be whilst still maintaining or increasing the same
standard of living. See
The Real Left-Right Paradigm
<-- Left <-- Less Freedom <-- Government Power |
Individual Liberty --> More Freedom --> Right --> Far-Right
Communism/Nazism/Fascism/Marxist <-- Socialism <-- Liberalism/Progressivism <-- Centrism
--> Conservativism --> Libertarianism --> Anarchism
extended extract is from the
The Origin of 'Identity Politics' & 'Political Correctness'
(sometimes dubbed 'political correctness') is the result of a
political-Left major backlash against the mass of ordinary people
(in Europe and 'the West'), beginning in the 1920s/30s, in the wake
of the persistent failure of Marxist theory to be realised in
European 'revolution' or any real change through democracy. In
shifting the blame away from Marxist theory and those gullible
enough to adhere to it, and on to those the theory had prescribed
and predicted would have been the beneficiaries, if only they had
responded accordingly ('the [white, male] workers'); then the
cognitive-dissonance within the political-left mindset caused by
this crisis to an extent was salved"
"As with any fervent ideology, a
hallmark of the political-Left is interpreting anything and
everything in its own ideological terms to claim as a manifestation
of the ideology and its prophecy - jumping on a bandwagon, so to
speak; though here only to hijack it. The bandwagon here was, of
course, the American civil rights movement, which though enjoying
ubiquitous support within black communities - to the point often of
various forms of extremism - featured virtually nil endorsement of
socialism ... It is from the time of this co-option that 'identity
politics' dates; many considering that the movement was incorporated
into the Left in the wake of King's assassination in 1968 - the
major turning-point year in political-Left politics generally"
"'Civil rights', as the first great
'single-issue' campaign, served not least to provide an acceptable
cloak for the Left to avoid provoking a resurgence of McCarthysim.
The major social upheaval of 'civil rights' with its large-scale and
widespread rioting was easily the nearest thing in then recent US
history to look like the promised Marxist 'revolution', and
obviously was just the practical application the 'theory' was
seeking. Moreover, the protagonists (black Americans) were eminently
separable form the now despised 'workers' per se, in being
presentable as a new 'group; from outside of the former fray of
'boss' versus 'worker'.
"This accident of history served to
add 'black' to 'woman' as 'the new oppressed' ... 'The worker' in
effect was retrospectively stereotyped as both 'man' and 'white'.
With the inverse of this stereotype of 'white' being not just 'black
American' but 'black' - that is, ethnic-minority generically ... so
it was that the new 'agents of social change' / 'disadvantaged' /
'oppressed' were extended from women to also include all ethnic
"It is only with the knowledge of how
this developed that sense can be made of why ethnicity is held above
the myriad other possible differences that could be utilised as
in-group markers, when in fact there is nothing inherent in
ethnicity as an in-group marker to produce inter-group prejudice
that is particularly more pernicious"
"Indeed, the worst inter-communal
conflicts nominally between different ethnicities usually are
between different cultural heritages with no discernible 'racial'
differences of any kind - and what (non-ethnic) differences there
are can be minimal; the lack of contrast actually fuelling the
intensity of conflict, such is the need for groups to feel
distinguished from each other"
"Furthermore, ethnic prejudice is
anything but restricted to or even predominantly 'white' on 'black':
inter-ethnic (eg, 'black' on Asian) and ethnic-on-'white' 'racism'
can be, often is and may usually be the greater problem; and a
negative attitude to a certain ethnicity does not imply a similar
attitude to other ethnicities"
"The specific US experience, given
the highly divisive politics in the wake of the American Civil War
over the basis of the Southern US economy in African slavery, does
not translate to elsewhere; notably not to Europe - as was starkly
evidenced in the experience of World War II 'black' American GIs
stationed in England in how they were favourably received by locals,
who sided with them when discriminated against"
"'Racial divides' in European 'white'
host countries are the result not of mutual antipathy but
affiliative forces, principally within migrant enclaves and
secondarily within the 'host' community; in both cases being through
in-group 'love', not out-group 'hate'"
[EMcD: though the latter
part of this observation is indeed true in normal circumstances,
this does not, of course, take account of the Islamic/Koranic
doctrines of Al-Hijra (Immigration), Taqiyya (Lying and Deceit), and Razzia/Ghazwa
(Rape and Slavery), Dawa (Cultural and Stealth Jihad), and Terrorist
and Violent Jihad, carried out by fundamentalist Muslims as
they settle in increasing numbers in Western countries with the sole
purpose of making every remaining Dar al-Harb ('House of War': i.e.
any non-Muslim country) into a Dar al-Islam ('House of Submission': i.e all Muslim countries) until Islam finally achieves its
longed-for global Caliphate.]
[End of Extract]
"The Frankfurt School
believed that as long as an individual had the belief - or even the
hope of belief - that his divine gift of reason could solve the
problems facing society, then that society would never reach the
state of hopelessness and alienation that they considered necessary
to provoke socialist revolution.
Their task, therefore, was as
swiftly as possible to undermine the Judaeo-Christian legacy. To do
this they called for the most negative destructive criticism
possible of every sphere of life which would be designed to
de-stabilize society and bring down what they saw as the
'oppressive' order. Their policies, they hoped, would spread like a
virus - 'continuing the work of Western Marxists by other means' as
one of their members noted.
To further the advance
of their 'quiet' cultural revolution ... the [Frankfurt] School
recommended (among other things):
(1) the creation of racism
(2) continual change to create confusion,
(3) the teaching
of sex and homosexuality to children,
(4) the undermining of
schools' and teachers' authority,
(5) huge immigration to destroy
(6) the promotion of excessive drinking,
(7) emptying of
(8) an unreliable legal system with bias against victims
(9) dependency on the state or state benefits,
control and dumbing down of media,
(11) encouraging the breakdown of
One of the main ideas
of the Frankfurt School was to exploit Freud's idea of 'pansexualism'
- the search for pleasure, the exploitation of the differences
between the sexes, the overthrowing of traditional relationships
between men and women. To further their aims they would:
the authority of the father, deny the specific roles of father and
mother, and wrest away from families their rights as primary
educators of their children,
(b) abolish differences in the
education of boys and girls,
(c) abolish all forms of male dominance
- hence the presence of women in the armed forces,
(d) declare women
to be an 'oppressed class' and men as 'oppressors'."
eight levels of control that must be obtained before you are able to
create a social state:
Healthcare - Control healthcare and you control the
Poverty - Increase the Poverty level as high as
possible, poor people are easier to control and will not fight
back if you are providing everything for them to live;
- Increase the debt to an unsustainable level. That wa6y you are
able to increase taxes, and this will produce more poverty;
Control - Remove the ability to defend themselves from
the Government. That way you are able to create a police state;
Welfare - Take control of every aspect of their lives
(Food, Housing, and Income);
Education - Take control of that people read and listen
to - take control of what children learn in school;
Religion - Remove the belief in God from the Government
Class Warfare - Divide the people into the wealthy and
the poor. This will cause more discontent and it will be easier
to take from (tax) the wealthy with the support of the poor" [source].
"Woe unto them that call evil
good, and good evil;
that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that
put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!
Woe unto them that are wise in their own eyes, and prudent in their own sight!"
note that the inclusion of any quotation or item on this page does not
imply we would necessarily endorse the source from which the extract is
taken; neither can we necessarily vouch for any other materials by the
or any groups or
ministries or websites with which they may be associated, or any
periodicals to which they may contribute, or the
beliefs of whatever kind they may hold, or any other aspect of their
work or ministry or position.