Quotes and Comments
"Paths of development,
region-specific rather than based on narrow national interests, must
be designed to lead to a sustainable balance between the
interdependent world-regions and to global harmony. A 'horizontal'
restructuring of the world system is needed, i.e., a change in
relationships among nations and regions and as far as the 'vertical'
structure of the world system is concerned, drastic changes in the
norm stratum. Cooperation by definition connotes interdependence.
Increasing interdependence between nations and regions must then
translate as a decrease in independence"
[Club of Rome, Mankind
at the Turning Point, 1974, quoted at:
precede globalism. We foresee a seamless system of governance from
local communities, individual states, regional unions and up through
to the United Nations itself. The concept of national sovereignty
has been immutable, indeed a sacred principle of international
relations. It is a principle which will yield only slowly and
reluctantly to the new imperatives of global environmental
cooperation" [UN's final
report, Commission on Global Governance, chaired by Maurice Strong,
"The UN was a lovely idea, but its primary objective was to make
sure the British Empire was got rid of"
[James Lovelock, 29 March 2010, quoted
"Democracy isn't working properly. First of all because it is
subverted by Globalist oligarchs, but frankly, also because too many
people ... are addicted to Socialism and welfare handouts the way a
drug addict is addicted to heroin"
"If the euro fails, not only the currency fails. Europe fails too,
and the idea of European unification. We have a common currency, but
no common political and economic union. And this is exactly what we
must change. To achieve this - therein lies the opportunity of this
crisis" [Angela Merkel quoted at
"When a new British
Prime Minister takes office, he goes immediately to Buckingham
Palace to kiss hands with the Monarch. When a new French President
takes office, he goes immediately to Berlin to kiss hands with the
Chancellor of Germany. Why does nobody comment on this? Is it
because it is too embarrassing to acknowledge the tragic truth, that
France is a German vassal? [Peter Hitchens, Mail on Sunday,
20 May 2012].
"You have to hand it to them these Marxists are pretty smart in a
sneaky kind of way, whilst we were all focussed on defeating
communism in the east, they infiltrated all our political parties
and institutions in Western Europe and slowly turned them all
Marxist, including today's conservative party in Britain under David
Cameron. They did it in such a subtle - to many - way, using the
excuse of progressivism that only now have people woken up and
realised that Europe is a Marxist multicultural totalitarian police
state. Some probably still don't realise it and continue to vote for
the Marxist labour Party in Britain whilst looking forward to the
next episode of the X Factor or Strictly Come Dancing. They have
been bought off with bread and circuses whilst not realising they
are living in a prison" [comment
"May I volunteer to
teach BBC staff our lovely customary English measures, which are now
to be brought back into schools? The poor things are
floundering with the foreign metric system, recently claiming that
some cliffs in the Falklands (actually 600 feet high) towered to a
height of '2,000 metres'. This is because metric measurements
are inhuman, and hard to memorise or imagine"
Mail on Sunday, 13 January 2013].
referendum pledge is such a blatant attempt to fend off UKIP that
surely even the dimmest voter can see through it. UKIP voters, in
any case, are actually far more worried about mass immigration than
they are about the EU. As well they might be, since the current
Government is actively continuing New Labour's policy of 'rubbing
the Right's nose in diversity' by permitting immense, unrestricted,
revolutionary migration. This - the next stage is the unstoppable
arrival of who knows how many Bulgarians and Romanians - is in fact
a direct result of our EU membership and could be halted only by our
leaving. Yet our national understanding of this issue is still so
poor that most people won't know that when it happens. And so we
struggle on, dragged ever deeper into an unfriendly empire we don't
even understand" [Peter Hitchens, Mail on Sunday, 27 January
"Time to defy the EU:
David Cameron encourages Indians who share our values and work ethic
to settle in Britain, but not Romanians and Bulgarians, who he
perhaps feels have less to offer. He has launched a doomed campaign
to deter these Eastern Europeans from coming here, and is exploring
ways to deny them use of the NHS and other public services. Yet the
idea that we will compromise our civilised values by allowing
Romanian women to give birth on the pavement, or injured Bulgarians
to rot from gangrene, is simply preposterous. If we don't want these
people here, ban them from coming at all, and dare the EU to stop
us" [Simon Heffer, Daily Mail, 16 February 1013].
"First, politicians want
to muzzle the Press and end freedom of speech in Britain. Now we
learn that some of the pressure groups campaigning for such
totalitarianism are receiving European Union funds. The EU has long
hated freedom of speech - threatening to stop the pensions of former
employees who criticise it, sacking whistleblowers and even
punishing MEPs who make anti-European remarks. It's another example
of the anti-democratic nature of the EU that we must avoid here
[Simon Heffer, Daily Mail, 20 April 2013].
"It's such a pity that
nobody knows any history, or it would be quite obvious what
so-called Scottish 'Independence' is about. Our continental enemies
sought for centuries to detach Scotland from England, to weaken us.
Now they're doing it again. If Scotland breaks away from England, it
won't be run from Edinburgh, but from Brussels and Frankfurt, and
Scots will discover what it's really like to be someone else's
subject province. I'm sure they'll have more sense"
Mail on Sunday, 01 December 2013].
"Unilateral action is
not really helpful because it risks presenting the UK as the kind of
nasty country in the European Union"
[Brussels Commissioner Laszio
Andor warns David Cameron over his plans to curb migration from
other EU states, Quotes of the Week, Mail on Sunday, 01 December
"Dominic Grieve, the
Attorney-General, says that the EU is engaged in a 'flagrant' power
grab from member states. Meanwhile, Lord Judge, the former Lord
Chief Justice, warns that a 'democratic deficit' will result if the
European Court, rather than Westminster, keeps on making our laws.
With men of such eminence arguing so wisely, David Cameron must
reconsider his decision to wait until 2017 to have a referendum on
Europe. If our democratic rights are being smashed in this way,
surely we need to discuss it now, not in four years time?" [Simon Heffer, Daily Mail, 07 December 2013].
UN 'Children's Commissars'
Call for Ban on Smacking
"These people should mind their own business. I don't care what they
think, they have had no part in raising my kids nor is it any
business of theirs to interfere in the family home. Far too many
people social engineering in this country. If it's not the state
trying to enforce acceptance of deviancy it is some other busy body
trying to interfere with family life" /
"These people have obviously never had children" /
"Spare the rod, spoil the child. Just another attack on Christendom"
/ "Don't smack them - take them to McDonald's and make
them obese" / "Would that parents smacked
their little darlings a little more regularly. If they had perhaps
we would not have so many spoiled-brat liberals telling the rest of
us what to do" [comments at
"From the deeply flawed UN, to the ever more imperial EU, supported
by most in our fawning, sycophantic government, there are far too
many 'experts', most of whom just lead us up the Socialist garden
path to where? The rubbish tip at the bottom of the garden where all
dreams lie shattered, buried and forgotten" [comment at
"I am beginning to hate the UN more than the EU if that is possible.
Still, they are all in the same boat. Both have unelected,
unaccountable commissioners, both dictate and try to enforce
regulations ranging from the stupid through to the downright
dangerous, both wish to undermine nation state democracy and both
have 'celebrities' continually rambling on about how wonderful it
is" / "I doubt any of our so-called
commissioners have ever held a proper job of work" /
"Anything with UN in its title is both corrupt and pernicious"
/ "Poking their noses into things that don't concern
them - yet again"
"These four children's
commissioners raise four very valid questions:  Why do we have
children's commissioners?  How much taxpayers' money is wasted on
their staff and their various hangers-on in addiction to the
£140,000 each?  Why are they on £140,000? Their shrill baseless
antidemocratic stupidity could be easily replaced by submitting the
UK pages of that week's Guardian as a report instead - if we
actually wanted to do that. And we don't.  Why didn't Dave
'bonfire of the Quangos' Cameron fire them? In fact, why haven't we
cut our contribution to the UN on the grounds that it is a worthless
talking shop that is guaranteed to arrive [at] a crisis with the
wrong solution 9 months late? Actually, I wouldn't say the UN is
worthless, I would say it is actively harmful to the Western world"
/ "If we assume that the other three positions are on a
salary of £100,000 a year, then cancelling this quango would save at
least £500,000 a year, which is an underestimate since these Bobos*
will have a back office full of pen pushers. *Bobos = bourgeois
bohemians = the Neo-Left/Progressive Guardianista middle/upper class
trendy multiculti posers"
"Why bother with
elections at all when we have unelected Commissioners telling us how
to live our lives ... I would be far happier if these people, so
enthusiastic about UN Conventions, would take up our cause on the
UN's Convention on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. In a country
where we not considered to be indigenous to it and are currently
experiencing a programme of gradual race replacement and cultural
genocide" / "Ah but the leftists who run
these places like the UN and EU don't care about 'horribly white'
people like you and me. It is simply not possible for us to be
indigenes of anywhere. We are totally evil, nasty, Christian ...
Heritage people who have made the mistake of not presenting
ourselves as 'victims'. It is the rest of the world that are
victims, of us, especially the white men, oh yes they must be
downtrodden" / "That's true"
"These so-called experts
would do well to focus on the atrocities against children and others
in Islamic communities. Now THAT'S a real problem. The hypocrisy is
astounding!" / "How about you concentrate on
FGM? child indoctrination and the wholesale rape of white British
girls? You know, there's something a bit more important, you won't
have to look far, you'll find the same group of people doing it all"
/ "Not PC" / "and not easy.
White people are less likely to wield a machete" /
"The Rotherhams of this world should be the focus of these
quangocrats, they deserve six of the best for ignoring the serious
issues" / "So are they investigating muslim
countries? What about wife beating and FGM? I think those are
slightly higher up the list than smacking kids. Or is this some kind
of racism whereby people who are non-white are not expected to keep
up to European standards of behaviour because they are somehow
extended extract is from the
The Origin of 'Identity Politics' & 'Political Correctness'
(sometimes dubbed 'political correctness') is the result of a
political-Left major backlash against the mass of ordinary people
(in Europe and 'the West'), beginning in the 1920s/30s, in the wake
of the persistent failure of Marxist theory to be realised in
European 'revolution' or any real change through democracy. In
shifting the blame away from Marxist theory and those gullible
enough to adhere to it, and on to those the theory had prescribed
and predicted would have been the beneficiaries, if only they had
responded accordingly ('the [white, male] workers'); then the
cognitive-dissonance within the political-left mindset caused by
this crisis to an extent was salved"
"As with any fervent ideology, a
hallmark of the political-Left is interpreting anything and
everything in its own ideological terms to claim as a manifestation
of the ideology and its prophecy - jumping on a bandwagon, so to
speak; though here only to hijack it. The bandwagon here was, of
course, the American civil rights movement, which though enjoying
ubiquitous support within black communities - to the point often of
various forms of extremism - featured virtually nil endorsement of
socialism ... It is from the time of this co-option that 'identity
politics' dates; many considering that the movement was incorporated
into the Left in the wake of King's assassination in 1968 - the
major turning-point year in political-Left politics generally"
"'Civil rights', as the first great
'single-issue' campaign, served not least to provide an acceptable
cloak for the Left to avoid provoking a resurgence of McCarthysim.
The major social upheaval of 'civil rights' with its large-scale and
widespread rioting was easily the nearest thing in then recent US
history to look like the promised Marxist 'revolution', and
obviously was just the practical application the 'theory' was
seeking. Moreover, the protagonists (black Americans) were eminently
separable form the now despised 'workers' per se, in being
presentable as a new 'group; from outside of the former fray of
'boss' versus 'worker'.
"This accident of history served to
add 'black' to 'woman' as 'the new oppressed' ... 'The worker' in
effect was retrospectively stereotyped as both 'man' and 'white'.
With the inverse of this stereotype of 'white' being not just 'black
American' but 'black' - that is, ethnic-minority generically ... so
it was that the new 'agents of social change' / 'disadvantaged' /
'oppressed' were extended from women to also include all ethnic
"It is only with the knowledge of how
this developed that sense can be made of why ethnicity is held above
the myriad other possible differences that could be utilised as
in-group markers, when in fact there is nothing inherent in
ethnicity as an in-group marker to produce inter-group prejudice
that is particularly more pernicious"
"Indeed, the worst inter-communal
conflicts nominally between different ethnicities usually are
between different cultural heritages with no discernible 'racial'
differences of any kind - and what (non-ethnic) differences there
are can be minimal; the lack of contrast actually fuelling the
intensity of conflict, such is the need for groups to feel
distinguished from each other"
"Furthermore, ethnic prejudice is
anything but restricted to or even predominantly 'white' on 'black':
inter-ethnic (eg, 'black' on Asian) and ethnic-on-'white' 'racism'
can be, often is and may usually be the greater problem; and a
negative attitude to a certain ethnicity does not imply a similar
attitude to other ethnicities"
"The specific US experience, given
the highly divisive politics in the wake of the American Civil War
over the basis of the Southern US economy in African slavery, does
not translate to elsewhere; notably not to Europe - as was starkly
evidenced in the experience of World War II 'black' American GIs
stationed in England in how they were favourably received by locals,
who sided with them when discriminated against"
"'Racial divides' in European 'white'
host countries are the result not of mutual antipathy but
affiliative forces, principally within migrant enclaves and
secondarily within the 'host' community; in both cases being through
in-group 'love', not out-group 'hate'"
[EMcD: though the latter
part of this observation is indeed true in normal circumstances,
this does not, of course, take account of the Islamic/Koranic
doctrines of Al-Hijra (Immigration), Taqiyya (Lying and Deceit), and Razzia/Ghazwa
(Rape and Slavery), Dawa (Cultural and Stealth Jihad), and Terrorist
and Violent Jihad, carried out by fundamentalist Muslims as
they settle in increasing numbers in Western countries with the sole
purpose of making every remaining Dar al-Harb ('House of War': i.e.
any non-Muslim country) into a Dar al-Islam ('House of Submission': i.e all Muslim countries) until Islam finally achieves its
longed-for global Caliphate.]
[End of Extract]
"The Frankfurt School
believed that as long as an individual had the belief - or even the
hope of belief - that his divine gift of reason could solve the
problems facing society, then that society would never reach the
state of hopelessness and alienation that they considered necessary
to provoke socialist revolution.
Their task, therefore, was as
swiftly as possible to undermine the Judaeo-Christian legacy. To do
this they called for the most negative destructive criticism
possible of every sphere of life which would be designed to
de-stabilize society and bring down what they saw as the
'oppressive' order. Their policies, they hoped, would spread like a
virus - 'continuing the work of Western Marxists by other means' as
one of their members noted.
To further the advance
of their 'quiet' cultural revolution ... the [Frankfurt] School
recommended (among other things):
(1) the creation of racism
(2) continual change to create confusion,
(3) the teaching
of sex and homosexuality to children,
(4) the undermining of
schools' and teachers' authority,
(5) huge immigration to destroy
(6) the promotion of excessive drinking,
(7) emptying of
(8) an unreliable legal system with bias against victims
(9) dependency on the state or state benefits,
control and dumbing down of media,
(11) encouraging the breakdown of
One of the main ideas
of the Frankfurt School was to exploit Freud's idea of 'pansexualism'
- the search for pleasure, the exploitation of the differences
between the sexes, the overthrowing of traditional relationships
between men and women. To further their aims they would:
the authority of the father, deny the specific roles of father and
mother, and wrest away from families their rights as primary
educators of their children,
(b) abolish differences in the
education of boys and girls,
(c) abolish all forms of male dominance
- hence the presence of women in the armed forces,
(d) declare women
to be an 'oppressed class' and men as 'oppressors'."
eight levels of control that must be obtained before you are able to
create a social state:
Healthcare - Control healthcare and you control the
Poverty - Increase the Poverty level as high as
possible, poor people are easier to control and will not fight
back if you are providing everything for them to live;
- Increase the debt to an unsustainable level. That wa6y you are
able to increase taxes, and this will produce more poverty;
Control - Remove the ability to defend themselves from
the Government. That way you are able to create a police state;
Welfare - Take control of every aspect of their lives
(Food, Housing, and Income);
Education - Take control of that people read and listen
to - take control of what children learn in school;
Religion - Remove the belief in God from the Government
Class Warfare - Divide the people into the wealthy and
the poor. This will cause more discontent and it will be easier
to take from (tax) the wealthy with the support of the poor" [source].
"Woe unto them that call evil
good, and good evil;
that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that
put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!
Woe unto them that are wise in their own eyes, and prudent in their own sight!"
note that the inclusion of any quotation or item on this page does not
imply we would necessarily endorse the source from which the extract is
taken; neither can we necessarily vouch for any other materials by the
or any groups or
ministries or websites with which they may be associated, or any
periodicals to which they may contribute, or the
beliefs of whatever kind they may hold, or any other aspect of their
work or ministry or position.