One thing have I desired of the LORD, that will I seek after; that I may dwell in the house of the LORD all the days of my life (Psalm 27:4)                 Bayith Ministries

Bayith Home  |  Political Cultural and Social Issues  |  Political Correctness: Index of Topics

Political Correctness
Cultural Marxism's "Long March Through The Institutions" of Western Civilisation

"I saw the revolutionary destruction of Society as the one and only solution.
A worldwide overturning of values cannot take place without the annihilation of the old values
and the creation of new ones by the revolutionaries"

[George Lukacs, The Frankfurt School]

"We will make the West so corrupt that it stinks"
[Willi Munzenberg, The Frankfurt School]

The Tower of Babel:
Global Governance, UN, EU, NWO

Quotes and Comments

Quotes and Comments   |   UN Ban on Smacking

The Origin of Identity Politics   |   The Frankfurt School   |   Programmes of Treason

Political Correctness: Index of Quotes and Comments   |   Political Correctness: Index of Articles



Quotes and Comments

"Paths of development, region-specific rather than based on narrow national interests, must be designed to lead to a sustainable balance between the interdependent world-regions and to global harmony. A 'horizontal' restructuring of the world system is needed, i.e., a change in relationships among nations and regions and as far as the 'vertical' structure of the world system is concerned, drastic changes in the norm stratum. Cooperation by definition connotes interdependence. Increasing interdependence between nations and regions must then translate as a decrease in independence"
[Club of Rome, Mankind at the Turning Point, 1974, quoted at: source].

"Regionalism must precede globalism. We foresee a seamless system of governance from local communities, individual states, regional unions and up through to the United Nations itself. The concept of national sovereignty has been immutable, indeed a sacred principle of international relations. It is a principle which will yield only slowly and reluctantly to the new imperatives of global environmental cooperation"
[UN's final report, Commission on Global Governance, chaired by Maurice Strong, quoted at source].

"The UN was a lovely idea, but its primary objective was to make sure the British Empire was got rid of"
[James Lovelock, 29 March 2010, quoted at source].

"Democracy isn't working properly. First of all because it is subverted by Globalist oligarchs, but frankly, also because too many people ... are addicted to Socialism and welfare handouts the way a drug addict is addicted to heroin"
[comment at source].

"If the euro fails, not only the currency fails. Europe fails too, and the idea of European unification. We have a common currency, but no common political and economic union. And this is exactly what we must change. To achieve this - therein lies the opportunity of this crisis"
[Angela Merkel quoted at source].

"When a new British Prime Minister takes office, he goes immediately to Buckingham Palace to kiss hands with the Monarch. When a new French President takes office, he goes immediately to Berlin to kiss hands with the Chancellor of Germany. Why does nobody comment on this? Is it because it is too embarrassing to acknowledge the tragic truth, that France is a German vassal?
[Peter Hitchens, Mail on Sunday, 20 May 2012].

"You have to hand it to them these Marxists are pretty smart in a sneaky kind of way, whilst we were all focussed on defeating communism in the east, they infiltrated all our political parties and institutions in Western Europe and slowly turned them all Marxist, including today's conservative party in Britain under David Cameron. They did it in such a subtle - to many - way, using the excuse of progressivism that only now have people woken up and realised that Europe is a Marxist multicultural totalitarian police state. Some probably still don't realise it and continue to vote for the Marxist labour Party in Britain whilst looking forward to the next episode of the X Factor or Strictly Come Dancing. They have been bought off with bread and circuses whilst not realising they are living in a prison"
[comment at source].

"May I volunteer to teach BBC staff our lovely customary English measures, which are now to be brought back into schools?  The poor things are floundering with the foreign metric system, recently claiming that some cliffs in the Falklands (actually 600 feet high) towered to a height of '2,000 metres'.  This is because metric measurements are inhuman, and hard to memorise or imagine"
[Peter Hitchens, Mail on Sunday, 13 January 2013].

"[David Cameron's] referendum pledge is such a blatant attempt to fend off UKIP that surely even the dimmest voter can see through it. UKIP voters, in any case, are actually far more worried about mass immigration than they are about the EU. As well they might be, since the current Government is actively continuing New Labour's policy of 'rubbing the Right's nose in diversity' by permitting immense, unrestricted, revolutionary migration. This - the next stage is the unstoppable arrival of who knows how many Bulgarians and Romanians - is in fact a direct result of our EU membership and could be halted only by our leaving. Yet our national understanding of this issue is still so poor that most people won't know that when it happens. And so we struggle on, dragged ever deeper into an unfriendly empire we don't even understand"
[Peter Hitchens, Mail on Sunday, 27 January 2013].

"Time to defy the EU: David Cameron encourages Indians who share our values and work ethic to settle in Britain, but not Romanians and Bulgarians, who he perhaps feels have less to offer. He has launched a doomed campaign to deter these Eastern Europeans from coming here, and is exploring ways to deny them use of the NHS and other public services. Yet the idea that we will compromise our civilised values by allowing Romanian women to give birth on the pavement, or injured Bulgarians to rot from gangrene, is simply preposterous. If we don't want these people here, ban them from coming at all, and dare the EU to stop us"
[Simon Heffer, Daily Mail, 16 February 1013].

"First, politicians want to muzzle the Press and end freedom of speech in Britain. Now we learn that some of the pressure groups campaigning for such totalitarianism are receiving European Union funds. The EU has long hated freedom of speech - threatening to stop the pensions of former employees who criticise it, sacking whistleblowers and even punishing MEPs who make anti-European remarks. It's another example of the anti-democratic nature of the EU that we must avoid here
[Simon Heffer, Daily Mail, 20 April 2013].

"It's such a pity that nobody knows any history, or it would be quite obvious what so-called Scottish 'Independence' is about. Our continental enemies sought for centuries to detach Scotland from England, to weaken us. Now they're doing it again. If Scotland breaks away from England, it won't be run from Edinburgh, but from Brussels and Frankfurt, and Scots will discover what it's really like to be someone else's subject province. I'm sure they'll have more sense"
[Peter Hitchens, Mail on Sunday, 01 December 2013].

"Unilateral action is not really helpful because it risks presenting the UK as the kind of nasty country in the European Union"
[Brussels Commissioner Laszio Andor warns David Cameron over his plans to curb migration from other EU states, Quotes of the Week, Mail on Sunday, 01 December 2013].

"Dominic Grieve, the Attorney-General, says that the EU is engaged in a 'flagrant' power grab from member states. Meanwhile, Lord Judge, the former Lord Chief Justice, warns that a 'democratic deficit' will result if the European Court, rather than Westminster, keeps on making our laws. With men of such eminence arguing so wisely, David Cameron must reconsider his decision to wait until 2017 to have a referendum on Europe. If our democratic rights are being smashed in this way, surely we need to discuss it now, not in four years time?"
[Simon Heffer, Daily Mail, 07 December 2013].


UN 'Children's Commissars' Call for Ban on Smacking

"These people should mind their own business. I don't care what they think, they have had no part in raising my kids nor is it any business of theirs to interfere in the family home. Far too many people social engineering in this country. If it's not the state trying to enforce acceptance of deviancy it is some other busy body trying to interfere with family life"   /   "These people have obviously never had children"   /   "Spare the rod, spoil the child. Just another attack on Christendom"   /   "Don't smack them - take them to McDonald's and make them obese"   /   "Would that parents smacked their little darlings a little more regularly. If they had perhaps we would not have so many spoiled-brat liberals telling the rest of us what to do"
[comments at source].

"From the deeply flawed UN, to the ever more imperial EU, supported by most in our fawning, sycophantic government, there are far too many 'experts', most of whom just lead us up the Socialist garden path to where? The rubbish tip at the bottom of the garden where all dreams lie shattered, buried and forgotten" [comment at

"I am beginning to hate the UN more than the EU if that is possible. Still, they are all in the same boat. Both have unelected, unaccountable commissioners, both dictate and try to enforce regulations ranging from the stupid through to the downright dangerous, both wish to undermine nation state democracy and both have 'celebrities' continually rambling on about how wonderful it is"   /   "I doubt any of our so-called commissioners have ever held a proper job of work"   /   "Anything with UN in its title is both corrupt and pernicious"   /   "Poking their noses into things that don't concern them - yet again"
[comments at source].

"These four children's commissioners raise four very valid questions: [1] Why do we have children's commissioners? [2] How much taxpayers' money is wasted on their staff and their various hangers-on in addiction to the 140,000 each? [3] Why are they on 140,000? Their shrill baseless antidemocratic stupidity could be easily replaced by submitting the UK pages of that week's Guardian as a report instead - if we actually wanted to do that. And we don't. [4] Why didn't Dave 'bonfire of the Quangos' Cameron fire them? In fact, why haven't we cut our contribution to the UN on the grounds that it is a worthless talking shop that is guaranteed to arrive [at] a crisis with the wrong solution 9 months late? Actually, I wouldn't say the UN is worthless, I would say it is actively harmful to the Western world"   /   "If we assume that the other three positions are on a salary of 100,000 a year, then cancelling this quango would save at least 500,000 a year, which is an underestimate since these Bobos* will have a back office full of pen pushers. *Bobos = bourgeois bohemians = the Neo-Left/Progressive Guardianista middle/upper class trendy multiculti posers"
[comment at source].

"Why bother with elections at all when we have unelected Commissioners telling us how to live our lives ... I would be far happier if these people, so enthusiastic about UN Conventions, would take up our cause on the UN's Convention on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. In a country where we not considered to be indigenous to it and are currently experiencing a programme of gradual race replacement and cultural genocide"   /   "Ah but the leftists who run these places like the UN and EU don't care about 'horribly white' people like you and me. It is simply not possible for us to be indigenes of anywhere. We are totally evil, nasty, Christian ... Heritage people who have made the mistake of not presenting ourselves as 'victims'. It is the rest of the world that are victims, of us, especially the white men, oh yes they must be downtrodden"   /   "That's true"
[comments at source].

"These so-called experts would do well to focus on the atrocities against children and others in Islamic communities. Now THAT'S a real problem. The hypocrisy is astounding!"   /   "How about you concentrate on FGM? child indoctrination and the wholesale rape of white British girls? You know, there's something a bit more important, you won't have to look far, you'll find the same group of people doing it all"   /   "Not PC"   /   "and not easy. White people are less likely to wield a machete"   /   "The Rotherhams of this world should be the focus of these quangocrats, they deserve six of the best for ignoring the serious issues"   /   "So are they investigating muslim countries? What about wife beating and FGM? I think those are slightly higher up the list than smacking kids. Or is this some kind of racism whereby people who are non-white are not expected to keep up to European standards of behaviour because they are somehow primitive?"
[comments at source].


Identity Politics

The following extended extract is from the article: The Origin of 'Identity Politics' & 'Political Correctness'

"Identity politics (sometimes dubbed 'political correctness') is the result of a political-Left major backlash against the mass of ordinary people (in Europe and 'the West'), beginning in the 1920s/30s, in the wake of the persistent failure of Marxist theory to be realised in European 'revolution' or any real change through democracy. In shifting the blame away from Marxist theory and those gullible enough to adhere to it, and on to those the theory had prescribed and predicted would have been the beneficiaries, if only they had responded accordingly ('the [white, male] workers'); then the cognitive-dissonance within the political-left mindset caused by this crisis to an extent was salved"

"As with any fervent ideology, a hallmark of the political-Left is interpreting anything and everything in its own ideological terms to claim as a manifestation of the ideology and its prophecy - jumping on a bandwagon, so to speak; though here only to hijack it. The bandwagon here was, of course, the American civil rights movement, which though enjoying ubiquitous support within black communities - to the point often of various forms of extremism - featured virtually nil endorsement of socialism ... It is from the time of this co-option that 'identity politics' dates; many considering that the movement was incorporated into the Left in the wake of King's assassination in 1968 - the major turning-point year in political-Left politics generally"

"'Civil rights', as the first great 'single-issue' campaign, served not least to provide an acceptable cloak for the Left to avoid provoking a resurgence of McCarthysim. The major social upheaval of 'civil rights' with its large-scale and widespread rioting was easily the nearest thing in then recent US history to look like the promised Marxist 'revolution', and obviously was just the practical application the 'theory' was seeking. Moreover, the protagonists (black Americans) were eminently separable form the now despised 'workers' per se, in being presentable as a new 'group; from outside of the former fray of 'boss' versus 'worker'.

"This accident of history served to add 'black' to 'woman' as 'the new oppressed' ... 'The worker' in effect was retrospectively stereotyped as both 'man' and 'white'. With the inverse of this stereotype of 'white' being not just 'black American' but 'black' - that is, ethnic-minority generically ... so it was that the new 'agents of social change' / 'disadvantaged' / 'oppressed' were extended from women to also include all ethnic minorities"

"It is only with the knowledge of how this developed that sense can be made of why ethnicity is held above the myriad other possible differences that could be utilised as in-group markers, when in fact there is nothing inherent in ethnicity as an in-group marker to produce inter-group prejudice that is particularly more pernicious"

"Indeed, the worst inter-communal conflicts nominally between different ethnicities usually are between different cultural heritages with no discernible 'racial' differences of any kind - and what (non-ethnic) differences there are can be minimal; the lack of contrast actually fuelling the intensity of conflict, such is the need for groups to feel distinguished from each other"

"Furthermore, ethnic prejudice is anything but restricted to or even predominantly 'white' on 'black': inter-ethnic (eg, 'black' on Asian) and ethnic-on-'white' 'racism' can be, often is and may usually be the greater problem; and a negative attitude to a certain ethnicity does not imply a similar attitude to other ethnicities"

"The specific US experience, given the highly divisive politics in the wake of the American Civil War over the basis of the Southern US economy in African slavery, does not translate to elsewhere; notably not to Europe - as was starkly evidenced in the experience of World War II 'black' American GIs stationed in England in how they were favourably received by locals, who sided with them when discriminated against"

"'Racial divides' in European 'white' host countries are the result not of mutual antipathy but affiliative forces, principally within migrant enclaves and secondarily within the 'host' community; in both cases being through in-group 'love', not out-group 'hate'" [EMcD: though the latter part of this observation is indeed true in normal circumstances, this does not, of course, take account of the Islamic/Koranic doctrines of Al-Hijra (Immigration), Taqiyya (Lying and Deceit), and Razzia/Ghazwa (Rape and Slavery), Dawa (Cultural and Stealth Jihad), and Terrorist and Violent Jihad, carried out by fundamentalist Muslims as they settle in increasing numbers in Western countries with the sole and deliberate purpose of making every remaining Dar al-Harb ('House of War': i.e. any non-Muslim country) into a Dar al-Islam ('House of Submission': i.e all Muslim countries) until Islam finally achieves its longed-for global Caliphate.]

[End of Extract]


The Frankfurt School

"The Frankfurt School believed that as long as an individual had the belief - or even the hope of belief - that his divine gift of reason could solve the problems facing society, then that society would never reach the state of hopelessness and alienation that they considered necessary to provoke socialist revolution.

Their task, therefore, was as swiftly as possible to undermine the Judaeo-Christian legacy. To do this they called for the most negative destructive criticism possible of every sphere of life which would be designed to de-stabilize society and bring down what they saw as the 'oppressive' order. Their policies, they hoped, would spread like a virus - 'continuing the work of Western Marxists by other means' as one of their members noted.

To further the advance of their 'quiet' cultural revolution ... the [Frankfurt] School recommended (among other things):

(1) the creation of racism offences,
(2) continual change to create confusion,
(3) the teaching of sex and homosexuality to children,
(4) the undermining of schools' and teachers' authority,
(5) huge immigration to destroy identity,
(6) the promotion of excessive drinking,
(7) emptying of churches,
(8) an unreliable legal system with bias against victims of crime,
(9) dependency on the state or state benefits,
(10) control and dumbing down of media,
(11) encouraging the breakdown of the family.

One of the main ideas of the Frankfurt School was to exploit Freud's idea of 'pansexualism' - the search for pleasure, the exploitation of the differences between the sexes, the overthrowing of traditional relationships between men and women. To further their aims they would:

(a) attack the authority of the father, deny the specific roles of father and mother, and wrest away from families their rights as primary educators of their children,
(b) abolish differences in the education of boys and girls,
(c) abolish all forms of male dominance - hence the presence of women in the armed forces,
(d) declare women to be an 'oppressed class' and men as 'oppressors'."


Programmes of Treason

"There are eight levels of control that must be obtained before you are able to create a social state:

  • Healthcare - Control healthcare and you control the people;

  • Poverty - Increase the Poverty level as high as possible, poor people are easier to control and will not fight back if you are providing everything for them to live;

  • Debt - Increase the debt to an unsustainable level. That wa6y you are able to increase taxes, and this will produce more poverty;

  • Gun Control - Remove the ability to defend themselves from the Government. That way you are able to create a police state;

  • Welfare - Take control of every aspect of their lives (Food, Housing, and Income);

  • Education - Take control of that people read and listen to - take control of what children learn in school;

  • Religion - Remove the belief in God from the Government and schools;

  • Class Warfare - Divide the people into the wealthy and the poor. This will cause more discontent and it will be easier to take from (tax) the wealthy with the support of the poor" [source].




"Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil;
that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!
Woe unto them that are wise in their own eyes, and prudent in their own sight!"
(Isaiah 5:20-21)




Please note that the inclusion of any quotation or item on this page does not imply we would necessarily endorse the source from which the extract is taken; neither can we necessarily vouch for any other materials by the same authors, or any groups or ministries or websites with which they may be associated, or any periodicals to which they may contribute, or the beliefs of whatever kind they may hold, or any other aspect of their work or ministry or position.

Elizabeth McDonald