One thing have I desired of the LORD, that will I seek after; that I may dwell in the house of the LORD all the days of my life (Psalm 27:4)                 Bayith Ministries

Bayith Home  |  Political Cultural and Social Issues  |  Political Correctness: Index of Topics
 

Political Correctness
Cultural Marxism's "Long March Through The Institutions" of Western Civilisation

"I saw the revolutionary destruction of Society as the one and only solution.
A worldwide overturning of values cannot take place without the annihilation of the old values
and the creation of new ones by the revolutionaries"

[George Lukacs, The Frankfurt School]

"We will make the West so corrupt that it stinks"
[Willi Munzenberg, The Frankfurt School]

The Frankfurt School recommended:
"the teaching of sex and homosexuality to children
the exploitation of Freud's idea of 'pansexualism' - the search for pleasure
the overthrowing of traditional relationships between men and women"

Gender Fascism
Quotations and Comments

Homosexuality and the Slippery Slope...   |   Feminism and its Most Unfeminine Offspring

Gender Roles and the Feminisation of Men   |   The Children   |   Freedom of Speech and Extremism   |   Gender Ideology

Identity Politics   |   The Frankfurt School   |   Programmes of Treason   |   Gender Fascism: Articles

Political Correctness: Index of Quotes and Comments   |   Political Correctness: Index of Articles


 

Homosexuality and the Slippery Slope...


"Ian Baynham was a respected civil servant holding hands with his partner in Trafalgar Square when Ruby Thomas, a privately educated schoolgirl, launched a vicious attack on him. Screaming homophobic abuse, the drunken 17-year-old was part of a group that knocked Baynham to the ground and stomped on his head until he was dead. Yet Thomas was only charged with manslaughter and will be free in three years. The sentence is an outrage. So why aren't the gay [sic] lobby up in arms? Could it be because they are too busy persecuting Christian guest-house owners who would prefer gay [sic] couples not to share a bed under their roof?"
[Amanda Platell, Daily Mail, 29 January 2011].


"Stonewall isn't a benign and benevolent gay [sic] rights charity: it is an offensive, bullying, intolerant and actively-persecuting organisation which pillories Christians and vilifies those who disagree with its political agenda. It is, by its own definition of the term, fundamentally 'bigoted', and those who sponsor its abhorrent intimidation and harassment deserve to be duly tarnished for their ill-judged association"
[source].


"Nobody has been clinically diagnosed with homophobia. Not one. But if anyone accuses us of this we just say that we were born like it; it's in the genes and we have no choice but to be what we are. We might also say that we have been for therapy and counselling to get rid of our homophobia but this made us so depressed that we felt like committing suicide. But we now realise that God created us homophobes and we are coming out, confident and proud. The truth has set us free indeed. Hallelujah!"
[comment at source].


"We believers are told that we must pray for our leaders and especially for our Prime Minister... But... when David Cameron crosses the line and defies God by telling God He has got it wrong and sees fit to re-define marriage (which is in truth one woman united with one man, Holy Matrimony) then his days are numbered unless he repents"
[UKIP, Christian Soldiers, Issue 1, 2013, p10].


"This is what happens when marriage becomes about the emotional and sexual wants of adults. Divorced from the needs of children for a mother and a father committed to each other for life. Polygamy was outlawed in this country because it was demonstrated, again and again, to hurt women and children. Sadly, when marriage is elastic enough to mean anything, in due time it comes to mean nothing"
[Russel Moore, Southern Baptist Convention, quoted at source].


"What exactly, does one tell a five year old about sex?"   /   "That it's how mummy and daddy make babies. Just how parents managed for generations"   /   "Stay away from left wing teachers?"   /   "[T]his is classic Frankfurt School Cultural Marxism, Lukacs did this in Hungary"   /   "Innocence is mocked, that's the problem. Innocence should be a virtue"   /   "We all know there is an agenda here. Certain people in government want to make sure that the first time children learn anything about sex it won't just be about male+female, and it won't just be about 'making babies' - which is where most parents start. And that's why parents are not to be trusted with sex education"   /   "But the sex education won't be what most normal parents would understand as sex education, it will focus on 'normalising' minority sexual practices and aim to confuse juveniles on their own sexuality (all in the name of fairness) so adding another tool to the liberal progressive box of tricks to undermine and marginalise the desire for normal stable dual sex relationships. Indoctrinate them young and they become putty in the hands of the Fabians - but for the children's own good of course, let's not forget to accompany this social engineering exercise with the stock claim the elite use to excuse the evil they perpetrate"   /   "We all know where this is going don't we? First they will bring this in. After 5 years, they will then start 'debating' how our children are soooo much more sexually aware, that the age of consent must come down 'as the right thing to do'. As time goes on it will be lowered incrementally until it suits our perverted leadership's desires"
[comments at source].


"Why would our leaders seek to numb our traditional senses of morality, you might ask? Simple. A morally-debased society is one that is [in] need of greater control and governance. Degrade our moral intuition and the powers that be have more and more of an excuse to interfere for 'our own good'"
[source].


"When was the last time you heard in the news of a gay [sic] couple demanding a Muslim-run bakery bake them a cake for their wedding or civil partnership ceremony? Probably never. Such is the hypocrisy of the Gaystapo army"
[source].


"My Christian belief helps me understand that man is a creature of will and has the freedom to choose what he desires. The orthodox Christian understanding is that it is morally wrong to force someone to act against their will. This includes coercing gay [sic] people to enter into a traditional union. In the same way, the orthodox Christians and any decent freedom loving individual[s] understand that it is wrong to coerce people of faith, be they Jewish, Muslim or Christian, to support and participate in a union which they understand to be morally wrong"
[source].


"There is a significant difference between asking a florist to sell a gay [sic] couple flowers because they want to decorate their home and asking the same florists to decorate their wedding hall, thereby making profit off the celebration of a union which goes against the conscience of the florist"
[source].


"Curious how slow the judiciary are to understand what the Great Gay Cake issue is about. It has nothing to do with who asked for the cake, or even why. It has very little to do with cakes. It is about whether anyone can be compelled to say something he disagrees with. The bakers who refused to make the cake did so because they did not agree with the wording they were being asked to put on it. If someone can be forced by law to say something he disagrees with, we are not a free country. The nearest parallel I can think of is the way in which people in communist countries were forced to display red flags from their flats, or to carry placards bearing Marxist slogans they secretly hated"
[Peter Hitchens, Mail on Sunday, 24 May 2015].

 

Feminism and Its Most Unfeminine Offspring


"...the shocking case of Chloe Tebay, 18, who was dancing at Applejax, a nightclub in Chorley, Lancashire. A fellow clubber, Laura Lewis, out celebrating her birthday, turned to Chloe and said: 'I don't like the way you are dancing.' Before she could respond, Chloe was knocked to the floor and Lewis smashed her right foot into her face, breaking her nose. Chloe was unconscious and some other clubbers were spattered with her blood. Lewis was arrested, spent the night in the cells and was released in the morning after receiving a caution, as it was her first offence. Within hours of getting home, Lewis was on her Facebook page telling her 800 followers: 'Broken nose and WHAT had a sik (that's Chav-speak for 'good') birthday.'..."
[Kelvin MacKensie, Daily Mail, 14 April 2012].


"I was hauling a two-year-old in a buggy down some stairs at the station last week as a gaggle of teenage girls pushed past, swearing at each other like murderers on parole. A torrent of four-letter words turned the air blue. ... 'For f***'s sake, there's a little kid there,' one of the teens said to her friend, suddenly contrite. 'Yes, tone it down, girls,' I said, ... 'Sorry miss,' one of them said meekly. 'She's drunk[!]. She don't normally talk like that.'  A likely story. But intriguing. So some teenagers do realise that they're not supposed to swear. Let's hope they won't be reading J.K. Rowling's The Casual Vacancy, published to great fanfare this week. ... The novel has what my children call 'bad grown-up words' on every other page. ... it's a self-righteous piece of liberal propaganda. ... I am truly sick of seeing the sort of four-letter words that J.K. Rowling spouts like sparks from Voldemort's wand. They're becoming every-day chit-chat"
[Viv Groskop, Mail on Sunday, 30 September 2012].


"Today the rebellion of women against male domination is well under way among the intellectual classes; but among the general public it is by no means so far advanced. Nevertheless, the ferment has started to work. Among its manifestations is a determined, dignified insistence by women that they too have a right to be ordained to the priesthood. This idea has sent shudders through the Establishment of the Christian Church. One of the objections raised to the ordination of women has been that priestesses were associated with the old faiths of paganism and that their reappearance in the Church would somehow be a step backwards towards these faiths. This idea is, of course, quite correct, except that pagans would deny that it was a step backwards"
[Doreen Valiante, The Rebirth of Witchcraft, 1990, p. 181].


"In addition to misrepresenting sex, porn is reducing women to objects. And children. It shocks me that after all these years of women screaming about their feminist rights, they allow their little girls to reduce themselves into whores"
[comment at source].


"Don't look like trash, don't get drunk, don't be sick down your front, don't break your heels and stagger about in the wrong clothes at midnight. This is bad. I promise it is better to look after yourself properly ... don't be sick in the gutter at midnight in a silly dress with no money to get a taxi home because somebody will take advantage of you - either rape you, or they'll knock you on the head or they'll rob you"
[Joanna Lumley, speaking at M&S campaign launch, quoted in Mail on Sunday, 27 January 2013].


"All religions are agreed that when women behave badly, it signifies the end of civilization, which also of course is why most feminists deeply hate religion, except [for] the sick feminist pagan kind [of religion], which glorifies women and makes out God is a woman, 'a divine feminist'."
[comment at source].


"Fighting and killing an enemy in close combat is not a right nor an opportunity... It is a gut-churning, traumatic, incredibly tough job"
[Colonel Richard Kemp warns against putting women soldiers into frontline combat roles, Mail on Sunday, 11 May 2014].


"It turns out that Yes sometimes means No too, particularly when a woman is judged to be too inebriated to be capable of making a conscious decision. ... Even if she has said Yes and even undressed herself or initiated the sexual advances. Even if she at no point suggested she had changed her mind or asked the man to stop. Even if she blatantly enjoyed herself at the time. This is patently absurd. And yet this is precisely what the DPP has announced. Unlike any other offence, where the onus is on the prosecution to prove that the accused is guilty of a crime, this puts the responsibility squarely (if not fairly) on the shoulders of the accused to prove that he is innocent. In one fell swoop, [the DPP] has turned a fundamental principle of our justice system - the presumption of innocence - on its head"
[source].


"#PissForEquality was a Twitter campaign intended to dupe Feminists to wet themselves in the name of Equality, and to post photos. Sure enough, the non-thinking collectivists fell for it... it is precisely this group of blinded zombies - who call themselves 'norm critics', and with their gender-neutral toy campaigns, [who] meta-politically are deciding the future of our children"
[source].


"I was very active in the Libertarian Party (both national and state level) for about eight years, maybe ten, ending somewhere in the mid-to late '80s. Libertarian rhetoric is long on the individual's rights and freedoms, but short on responsibilities and obligations toward fellow citizens/human beings. Libertarians, by and large, don't seem to have heard of the Social Contract or very much else other than 'me, me, me'.  Interestingly, this was the lament of each and every WOMAN active in the LP that I talked to during my period of party activity"
[comment at source].


Charlotte Proudman/Bailye


"Anybody with an internet connection knows there are reports ... about the rape epidemic sweeping our countries, especially the Scandinavian ones. ... Where are the 'third-wave' feminists when girls as young as twelve are gang-raped by members of the 'Asian' ... community? Nowhere to be seen. ... That is the hypocrisy of the metro-left, especially the female metro-left, a hypocrisy which literally stinks to heaven. ... When will we take the 'third-wave' feminists to task for their hypocrisy, their self-aggrandisement, their delusions and their hard-heartedness on the face of multiple rapes, in all nations in the EU who 'open their arms' to the hijrah 'migrants'? [source].


"This was discussed on Woman's Hour this morning on BBC Radio 4. Two experts were on plus the interviewer who was shamelessly pro the female lawyer..."   /   "These [BBC] female presenters are wilfully blind, wilfully obtuse when it comes to the lives of any woman, any age, not falling within their own, narrow definition of what is now deemed to be properly 'feminist'"
[comments at source].


"What I find especially sickening is the cool and disturbing disregard they show towards all those who have been and are really raped and killed, across the EU, by the acolytes of that certain religion we mustn't mention. They are so wrapped up in their own 'feminist' importance that they do not see how their fake outrage plays into the hands of those who'd rather have all of them wrapped up in burkhas"
[comment at source].


"I find it hard to find the words to express my contempt for that stunningly silly girl who made such a fuss about the man's compliment. I think she had that photograph taken by a professional who took a lot of trouble with the lighting, the angle, the positioning of her head, and used all his/her photographic skills to create an image of the girl looking her very best. It didn't just happen. If she wanted to ensure that no one looked twice at her her photograph and paid her no compliments, why didn't she do a selfie of herself first thing in the morning, bleary-eyed, no make-up, no exquisitely coiffed hair, and stick THAT on Linked-In?"
[comment at source].


"This girl (I call her 'girl' because she has behaved like a spoilt brat) is a hypocrite of the worst kind who knows little or nothing of how a woman can really suffer at the hands of a wicked man. A real woman with a sense of humour, common sense, and self-possession would either have ignored his comment or simply said 'Thank you' without behaving as if he proposed to rape her. I have no patience with such females"
[comment at source]. 


"If she doesn't want anyone to look at her and think she's attractive, the next logical step is to don a head-to-foot burkha with only a little grille to look through so she doesn't fall flat on her face. The way we're heading in the this country and Europe generally, she might be ordered to dress exactly like that in the not-too-distant future and learn what sexism, chauvinism, and sheer misogyny are REALLY about"
[comment at source].


"[T]his madame, and all of her ilk, are thorough cowards. They flit around on the internet, don't talk to anybody out in the shops, pubs, public transport, anywhere. They stick to their very select own because the feminised men in their group are thoroughly cowed by them ... I have no words to express how much I despise them"
[comment at source].


Women's Suffrage


"From what I can gather, the breakdown in the link between rights and responsibilities seems to have started with women's suffrage, which was opposed for a very long time by many women who were very aware of the historical connection between the right to vote and the responsibility to serve in the military during wartime. They didn't want that particular responsibility so they didn't want the right that required it. I assume they took for granted that this link couldn't be broken. It seems as though the right to vote was eventually granted to women without any formalised corresponding connection. This connection seemed to be totally destroyed after WWII with the baby boomer generation, though the Greatest Generation appears to be the one that allowed it to happen. I don't know at this point if there's any way to reestablish the link between rights and responsibilities without civilizational collapse or at least [a] major social/political disaster like a WWIII"
[comment at source].


"Look at what [womens'] emotional outlook has done to politics. Look at how they've segued from relying on their husbands for moral guidance and maintenance to the state. The state has no real interest in women's welfare except as a constituency to manipulate - and oh, how easy it is to manipulate women who would prefer totalitarian government to the God-ordained loving counsel of a man who loves her. In her escape from her ordained role, she has successfully emasculated men and made of herself a slave to an uncaring tyrant. ... Europe slides into cataclysm because both men and women have forsaken their God-given roles. Buying into the cultural Marxist, post-modern narrative, they have NO defenses against the wicked designs of the elite who are using and abusing said naifs [naive persons] - and emasculated men - as fodder for Islamic carnage"
[comment at source].

 

Gender Roles and the Feminisation of Men


"[O]ur society's current and one-sided approach to gender rights is now desperately out-dated and socially destructive. ... [We need to h]ave respect for traditional masculine and feminine roles. In recent years there has been an underlying assumption that the traditional roles of the sexes are somehow morally wrong and in need of change. However most men want to be providers for their families and most women want to be nurturers - and there is nothing whatsoever wrong with that"
[source].


"Feminists have managed to completely turn American society on its rear end, creating the chaotic that the nation is drowning in today. The workplace, the arts, the churches and the schools have been feminised to the point of no return. The average male character on network TV is a weak twerp who hardly can spell his name. ... As a former middle and high school teacher, I've witnessed the feminist destruction of the nation's schools. In fact, the K-12 education world has been taken over by feminists and women ... While these policies and social changes are harmful to American society, they are the death knell for the US military. ... The military will eventually lose men like the education world. Eventually, men don't want to be around a feminised environment. Feminists will scream dinosaur! Equal opportunity! But there is no equal opportunity on a battlefield. Under the guise of equal opportunity, the warrior culture is becoming extinct. Under the guise of equal opportunity the feminisation of the US military is beginning to endanger us all"
[source].


"The oddest aspect of the EU's open borders policy and the BBC's support for it is that the left-liberal elites which have been busily feminising European manhood have now opened their arms (well, our arms, actually) to hordes of the most unreconstructed, hairy-chested, misogynistic, male chauvinists on the planet. The EU plans to force publicly-listed companies to reserve 40% of their board seats for women (inevitably the BBC has signalled its virtue by announcing a 50% quota by 2020) - while leaving European women vulnerable to attacks by testosterone-charged young men from relatively primitive cultures where an uncovered female head is regarded as an open invitation to abuse. Is there something about the unfettered masculinity of these recent arrivals that awakens atavistic urges in those liberals who have created a society in their metrosexual image?"
[source].


"Note [in this video] how the [immigrant] bully threatens to beat [the German boy] every day just to harden him up and make him a man. ... He doesn't know it yet, but his mother and sisters are now Moslem chattel property. He won't lift a finger to defend German women; he is a dhimmi at best. Most likely he will convert as a matter of bare survival, but he will always be a 'second-class Muslim', even if he submits. These IslamoNazi bullies will have him reciting the Shahada in less than a month, and after that, his sister is toast. Just fresh meat for the hijra jihadis ... The German boy now understands who are the Alpha males, and who are not: The Moslems are, and he isn't. ... If Islam wins in Europe ... all of the German girls and women (even the man-hating radical feminists and lesbians) will be raped, enslaved, or 'married' by force [and] there will be a rising generation of Muslims in Europe who are half-German"
[source].


"The European has succumbed to sixty years of Leftist indoctrination which has completely emasculated the European male and inculcated him in a slave morality. The Moslem male is instilled in turn with a Master morality and is educated from childhood that individuality and life have no value and that death in conquest of infidels is the greatest honor. The Moslem is taught that death in battle is the greatest reward with great treasures in the afterlife; while the European is taught that everything is relative and nothing is worth fighting for - certainly nothing is worth dying for"
[comment at source].


"Having taken over the education systems of Europe, the Left have prepared their populace for conquest and turned them into brainwashed sheep who baw and bray as their women are raped, groped and impregnated by foreign invaders. Nothing is worth fighting for; natural inclinations to defend one's territory and people have been eradicated"
[comment at source].


"The European male has been reduced to nothing better than a eunuch ready to guard the harems of their Islamic masters who will make whores of their wives, mothers and daughters. The European male has no dignity any longer, no pride, no core beliefs, no faith in God"
[comment at source].


"In America, we still have a chance ... We will not let these metrosexual eunuchs undermine us with their bathroom laws and other perversions ... We will continue to cling to our Bible and guns as the traitor Obamao so aptly observed because that is what will ensure our freedom from Leftist slavery and surrender to the Islamic juggernaut that is snuffing out the world in its noxious cloud of hate"
[comment at source].


"All too often we try to overturn God's perfect order and then wonder why our emasculated menfolk are not like the men of God in Scripture"
[DP&EMcD, Alpha the Unofficial Guide: Overview, (5th Revision, 2004), Endnote B4-8, p.193].

 

The Children


"It is impossible but that offenses will come: but woe unto him, through whom they come! It were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and he cast into the sea, than that he should offend one of these little ones" (Luke 17:1-2)


"The spread of pedophilia within the political establishment is in fact very severe, and has been exposed in Great Britain. In Germany, the 'Pedo-Sexual' movement is also very strong within the political aristocracy. This is being expressed meta-politically as well, The Cultural Marxist online magazine SALON recently published the piece: 'I'm a pedophile, but not a monster', in an effort to normalise it. The children are the future. And that is exactly why the Elite are out to destroy them, ... We have witnessed what the Elite, through the normalization process, have done through Cultural Marxism; a brainwash so severe that it rivals even the worst case of Wahhabism"
[source].

 

Freedom of Speech and Extremism


"The Government's plans for EDOs seem to be so broadly defined that they risk jeopardizing the free speech of those who support traditional marriage. In a letter to one of his constituents in July, Mark Spencer MP stated that the new measures would be used to stop teachers from teaching that gay marriage is wrong. Mr Spencer's letter followed suggestions from Education Secretary Nicky Morgan that if a pupil believes that 'homosexuality is wrong', it could raise extremism alarms. In September, there were comments on the Today programme from one of the front-line staff responsible for implementing 'Prevent', part of the Government's counter-terrorism strategy. Polly Harrow, Head of Safeguarding and Prevent at Kirklees College in West Yorkshire, said the Government's approach seeks 'not just tolerance, but acceptance of difference and others' and that although people can believe homosexuality is wrong - 'if you speak it out loud you might be breaking the law'. Before he became Justice Minister, Dominic Raab MP said: 'Those engaged in passionate debates - such as Christians objecting to gay marriage - could find themselves slapped down'. On the current evidence he might well be right"
[Are You An 'Extremist' For Supporting Marriage?, Christian Institute Newsletter, Autumn 2015].

 

Gender Ideology

The following extended extract is from the article: A De-Sexed Society is a De-Humanised Society

"As usual, tyranny comes disguised as 'civil rights'. ...

The transgender movement has never been about 'gender'. It's all about sex. Sex is the real target. 'Gender' is merely the politicized linguistic vehicle that facilitates a legal ban on sex distinctions. There aren't a whole lot of dots to connect to uncover the logic of where this leads: if you abolish sex distinctions in law, you can abolish state recognition of biological family lies, and the state can regulate personal relationships and consolidate power as never before.

Physical reality exists independent of 'gender identity non-discrimination' law - or any man-made law. Laws have no power to make reality go away, but they can change how people behave in response to reality. They can enforce disregard for reality through speech protocols, social and economic pressures, invasions of privacy, and thought policing. ...

Gender ideology is an effective tool. Cultural Marxists use it to corrupt language and sow confusion, especially among children. ...

Getting free people to reject freedom may seem a tall order. How, you might ask, could people ever be convinced to let go of their families and consent to such a dystopian social structure? How do you get public opinion on board with an agenda that leads them to deny the reality of their own humanity? There are lots of pieces to this puzzle, including the erosion of social trust, the breakdown of family, social polarization, and growing ignorance of history. But the groundwork has been laid over a long period of time.

  • Virtually all outlets of communication had to be on board - Hollywood, academia, the media.  Check.
  • All medical personnel, particularly mental health personnel, had to be 'educated' to comply with the transgender program or risk losing their licences.  Check.
  • The educational establishment had to imbue schoolchildren with the ideology.  Check.
  • Large corporations had to get on board as stakeholders and enforcers.  Check.
  • And, of course, the push to legally de-sex society had to be embedded - Trojan Horse style - within a slightly less alien idea, with the slick slogan 'marriage equality'.  Check.
  • Churches had to be brought on board so that even religion became a conduit for anti-truth.  Check.
  • Social, emotional, and economic pressures had to be established to censure anyone who dared to question the wisdom of it all.  Check.
  • Any such person had to be labelled a bigot, a hater, and a non-person.  Check.

At this point, the most primal and universal of human fears comes into play: the fear of being socially rejected. Self-censorship takes off. People start falsifying what they believe, until they eventually don't even know what they believe anymore. Nobody can talk openly to one another. In the end, it's as though we are each being marched into a separate solitary confinement cell. That's what happens when free association takes a hit, when the state severs particular relationships in the name of a collective togetherness. Then, when we can't verify reality with one another anymore - because we are so afraid of being ostracized - we end up living in an age of mass delusion.

The only way out is to affirm reality ... Let's start by reinjecting our language with one very good word that points to reality: sex. Yes, let's revive the word 'sex', and use it generously whenever referring to the biological reality of our physical nature. (And spiritual nature too.)  At the same time, let's refuse - always - to use the word 'gender' when we mean sex. It's a poisoned and weaponized word that has been used to legally de-sex and thus dehumanize us all. We must work together [EMcD: 'collectively', let's say] to resist its deception"

[End of Extract]

 

Identity Politics

The following extended extract is from the article: The Origin of 'Identity Politics' & 'Political Correctness'

"Identity politics (sometimes dubbed 'political correctness') is the result of a political-Left major backlash against the mass of ordinary people (in Europe and 'the West'), beginning in the 1920s/30s, in the wake of the persistent failure of Marxist theory to be realised in European 'revolution' or any real change through democracy. In shifting the blame away from Marxist theory and those gullible enough to adhere to it, and on to those the theory had prescribed and predicted would have been the beneficiaries, if only they had responded accordingly ('the [white, male] workers'); then the cognitive-dissonance within the political-left mindset caused by this crisis to an extent was salved"

"As with any fervent ideology, a hallmark of the political-Left is interpreting anything and everything in its own ideological terms to claim as a manifestation of the ideology and its prophecy - jumping on a bandwagon, so to speak; though here only to hijack it. The bandwagon here was, of course, the American civil rights movement, which though enjoying ubiquitous support within black communities - to the point often of various forms of extremism - featured virtually nil endorsement of socialism ... It is from the time of this co-option that 'identity politics' dates; many considering that the movement was incorporated into the Left in the wake of King's assassination in 1968 - the major turning-point year in political-Left politics generally"

"'Civil rights', as the first great 'single-issue' campaign, served not least to provide an acceptable cloak for the Left to avoid provoking a resurgence of McCarthysim. The major social upheaval of 'civil rights' with its large-scale and widespread rioting was easily the nearest thing in then recent US history to look like the promised Marxist 'revolution', and obviously was just the practical application the 'theory' was seeking. Moreover, the protagonists (black Americans) were eminently separable form the now despised 'workers' per se, in being presentable as a new 'group; from outside of the former fray of 'boss' versus 'worker'.

"This accident of history served to add 'black' to 'woman' as 'the new oppressed' ... 'The worker' in effect was retrospectively stereotyped as both 'man' and 'white'. With the inverse of this stereotype of 'white' being not just 'black American' but 'black' - that is, ethnic-minority generically ... so it was that the new 'agents of social change' / 'disadvantaged' / 'oppressed' were extended from women to also include all ethnic minorities"

"It is only with the knowledge of how this developed that sense can be made of why ethnicity is held above the myriad other possible differences that could be utilised as in-group markers, when in fact there is nothing inherent in ethnicity as an in-group marker to produce inter-group prejudice that is particularly more pernicious"

"Indeed, the worst inter-communal conflicts nominally between different ethnicities usually are between different cultural heritages with no discernible 'racial' differences of any kind - and what (non-ethnic) differences there are can be minimal; the lack of contrast actually fuelling the intensity of conflict, such is the need for groups to feel distinguished from each other"

"Furthermore, ethnic prejudice is anything but restricted to or even predominantly 'white' on 'black': inter-ethnic (eg, 'black' on Asian) and ethnic-on-'white' 'racism' can be, often is and may usually be the greater problem; and a negative attitude to a certain ethnicity does not imply a similar attitude to other ethnicities"

"The specific US experience, given the highly divisive politics in the wake of the American Civil War over the basis of the Southern US economy in African slavery, does not translate to elsewhere; notably not to Europe - as was starkly evidenced in the experience of World War II 'black' American GIs stationed in England in how they were favourably received by locals, who sided with them when discriminated against"

"'Racial divides' in European 'white' host countries are the result not of mutual antipathy but affiliative forces, principally within migrant enclaves and secondarily within the 'host' community; in both cases being through in-group 'love', not out-group 'hate'" [EMcD: though the latter part of this observation is indeed true in normal circumstances, this does not, of course, take account of the Islamic/Koranic doctrines of Al-Hijra (Immigration), Taqiyya (Lying and Deceit), and Razzia/Ghazwa (Rape and Slavery), Dawa (Cultural and Stealth Jihad), and Terrorist and Violent Jihad, carried out by fundamentalist Muslims as they settle in increasing numbers in Western countries with the sole and deliberate purpose of making every remaining Dar al-Harb ('House of War': i.e. any non-Muslim country) into a Dar al-Islam ('House of Submission': i.e all Muslim countries) until Islam finally achieves its longed-for global Caliphate.]

[End of Extract]

 

The Frankfurt School

"The Frankfurt School believed that as long as an individual had the belief - or even the hope of belief - that his divine gift of reason could solve the problems facing society, then that society would never reach the state of hopelessness and alienation that they considered necessary to provoke socialist revolution.

Their task, therefore, was as swiftly as possible to undermine the Judaeo-Christian legacy. To do this they called for the most negative destructive criticism possible of every sphere of life which would be designed to de-stabilize society and bring down what they saw as the 'oppressive' order. Their policies, they hoped, would spread like a virus - 'continuing the work of Western Marxists by other means' as one of their members noted.

To further the advance of their 'quiet' cultural revolution ... the [Frankfurt] School recommended (among other things):

(1) the creation of racism offences,
(2) continual change to create confusion,
(3) the teaching of sex and homosexuality to children,
(4) the undermining of schools' and teachers' authority,
(5) huge immigration to destroy identity,
(6) the promotion of excessive drinking,
(7) emptying of churches,
(8) an unreliable legal system with bias against victims of crime,
(9) dependency on the state or state benefits,
(10) control and dumbing down of media,
(11) encouraging the breakdown of the family.

One of the main ideas of the Frankfurt School was to exploit Freud's idea of 'pansexualism' - the search for pleasure, the exploitation of the differences between the sexes, the overthrowing of traditional relationships between men and women. To further their aims they would:

(a) attack the authority of the father, deny the specific roles of father and mother, and wrest away from families their rights as primary educators of their children,
(b) abolish differences in the education of boys and girls,
(c) abolish all forms of male dominance - hence the presence of women in the armed forces,
(d) declare women to be an 'oppressed class' and men as 'oppressors'."

 

Programmes of Treason

"There are eight levels of control that must be obtained before you are able to create a social state:

  • Healthcare - Control healthcare and you control the people;

  • Poverty - Increase the Poverty level as high as possible, poor people are easier to control and will not fight back if you are providing everything for them to live;

  • Debt - Increase the debt to an unsustainable level. That wa6y you are able to increase taxes, and this will produce more poverty;

  • Gun Control - Remove the ability to defend themselves from the Government. That way you are able to create a police state;

  • Welfare - Take control of every aspect of their lives (Food, Housing, and Income);

  • Education - Take control of that people read and listen to - take control of what children learn in school;

  • Religion - Remove the belief in God from the Government and schools;

  • Class Warfare - Divide the people into the wealthy and the poor. This will cause more discontent and it will be easier to take from (tax) the wealthy with the support of the poor" [source].

 

 

 

"Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil;
that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!
Woe unto them that are wise in their own eyes, and prudent in their own sight!"
(Isaiah 5:20-21)

"So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him;
male and female created he them"
(Genesis 1:27)

"...women rule over them.
O my people, they which lead thee cause thee to err, and destroy the way of thy paths"
(Isaiah 3:12)

"But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me,
it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck,
and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea"
(Matthew 18:6)

 

 

 

Please note that the inclusion of any quotation or item on this page does not imply we would necessarily endorse the source from which the extract is taken; neither can we necessarily vouch for any other materials by the same authors, or any groups or ministries or websites with which they may be associated, or any periodicals to which they may contribute, or the beliefs of whatever kind they may hold, or any other aspect of their work or ministry or position.

Elizabeth McDonald     https://www.bayith.org     bayith@blueyonder.co.uk