Homosexuality and the
"Ian Baynham was a
respected civil servant holding hands with his partner in Trafalgar
Square when Ruby Thomas, a privately educated schoolgirl, launched a
vicious attack on him. Screaming homophobic abuse, the drunken
17-year-old was part of a group that knocked Baynham to the ground
and stomped on his head until he was dead. Yet Thomas was only
charged with manslaughter and will be free in three years. The
sentence is an outrage. So why aren't the gay [sic] lobby up in
arms? Could it be because they are too busy persecuting Christian
guest-house owners who would prefer gay [sic] couples not to share a
bed under their roof?" [Amanda Platell, Daily Mail, 29
"Stonewall isn't a
benign and benevolent gay [sic] rights charity: it is an offensive,
bullying, intolerant and actively-persecuting organisation which
pillories Christians and vilifies those who disagree with its
political agenda. It is, by its own definition of the term,
fundamentally 'bigoted', and those who sponsor its abhorrent
intimidation and harassment deserve to be duly tarnished for their
ill-judged association" [source].
"Nobody has been clinically diagnosed with homophobia. Not one. But
if anyone accuses us of this we just say that we were born like it;
it's in the genes and we have no choice but to be what we are. We
might also say that we have been for therapy and counselling to get
rid of our homophobia but this made us so depressed that we felt
like committing suicide. But we now realise that God created us
homophobes and we are coming out, confident and proud. The truth has
set us free indeed. Hallelujah!"
"We believers are told
that we must pray for our leaders and especially for our Prime
Minister... But... when David Cameron crosses the line and defies
God by telling God He has got it wrong and sees fit to re-define
marriage (which is in truth one woman united with one man, Holy
Matrimony) then his days are numbered unless he repents"
Christian Soldiers, Issue 1, 2013, p10].
"This is what happens
when marriage becomes about the emotional and sexual wants of
adults. Divorced from the needs of children for a mother and a
father committed to each other for life. Polygamy was outlawed in
this country because it was demonstrated, again and again, to hurt
women and children. Sadly, when marriage is elastic enough to mean
anything, in due time it comes to mean nothing"
Southern Baptist Convention, quoted at
"What exactly, does one
tell a five year old about sex?" / "That
it's how mummy and daddy make babies. Just how parents managed for
generations" / "Stay away from left wing
teachers?" / "[T]his is classic Frankfurt
School Cultural Marxism, Lukacs did this in Hungary" /
"Innocence is mocked, that's the problem. Innocence should be a
virtue" / "We all know there is an agenda
here. Certain people in government want to make sure that the first
time children learn anything about sex it won't just be about
male+female, and it won't just be about 'making babies' - which is
where most parents start. And that's why parents are not to be
trusted with sex education" / "But the sex
education won't be what most normal parents would understand as sex
education, it will focus on 'normalising' minority sexual practices
and aim to confuse juveniles on their own sexuality (all in the name
of fairness) so adding another tool to the liberal progressive box
of tricks to undermine and marginalise the desire for normal stable
dual sex relationships. Indoctrinate them young and they become
putty in the hands of the Fabians - but for the children's own good
of course, let's not forget to accompany this social engineering
exercise with the stock claim the elite use to excuse the evil they
perpetrate" / "We all know where this is
going don't we? First they will bring this in. After 5 years, they
will then start 'debating' how our children are soooo much more
sexually aware, that the age of consent must come down 'as the right
thing to do'. As time goes on it will be lowered incrementally until
it suits our perverted leadership's desires"
"Why would our leaders
seek to numb our traditional senses of morality, you might ask?
Simple. A morally-debased society is one that is [in] need of
greater control and governance. Degrade our moral intuition and the
powers that be have more and more of an excuse to interfere for 'our
own good'" [source].
"When was the last time
you heard in the news of a gay [sic] couple demanding a Muslim-run
bakery bake them a cake for their wedding or civil partnership
ceremony? Probably never. Such is the hypocrisy of the Gaystapo
"My Christian belief
helps me understand that man is a creature of will and has the
freedom to choose what he desires. The orthodox Christian
understanding is that it is morally wrong to force someone to act
against their will. This includes coercing gay [sic] people to enter
into a traditional union. In the same way, the orthodox Christians
and any decent freedom loving individual[s] understand that it is
wrong to coerce people of faith, be they Jewish, Muslim or
Christian, to support and participate in a union which they
understand to be morally wrong"
"There is a significant
difference between asking a florist to sell a gay [sic] couple
flowers because they want to decorate their home and asking the same
florists to decorate their wedding hall, thereby making profit off
the celebration of a union which goes against the conscience of the
"Curious how slow the
judiciary are to understand what the Great Gay Cake issue is about.
It has nothing to do with who asked for the cake, or even why. It
has very little to do with cakes. It is about whether anyone can be
compelled to say something he disagrees with. The bakers who refused
to make the cake did so because they did not agree with the wording
they were being asked to put on it. If someone can be forced by law
to say something he disagrees with, we are not a free country. The
nearest parallel I can think of is the way in which people in
communist countries were forced to display red flags from their
flats, or to carry placards bearing Marxist slogans they secretly
hated" [Peter Hitchens, Mail on Sunday, 24 May 2015].
"...the shocking case of
Chloe Tebay, 18, who was dancing at Applejax, a nightclub in
Chorley, Lancashire. A fellow clubber, Laura Lewis, out celebrating
her birthday, turned to Chloe and said: 'I don't like the way you
are dancing.' Before she could respond, Chloe was knocked to the
floor and Lewis smashed her right foot into her face, breaking her
nose. Chloe was unconscious and some other clubbers were spattered
with her blood. Lewis was arrested, spent the night in the cells and
was released in the morning after receiving a caution, as it was her
first offence. Within hours of getting home, Lewis was on her
Facebook page telling her 800 followers: 'Broken nose and WHAT had a
sik (that's Chav-speak for 'good') birthday.'..."
Daily Mail, 14 April 2012].
"I was hauling a
two-year-old in a buggy down some stairs at the station last week as
a gaggle of teenage girls pushed past, swearing at each other like
murderers on parole. A torrent of four-letter words turned the air
blue. ... 'For f***'s sake, there's a little kid there,' one of the
teens said to her friend, suddenly contrite. 'Yes, tone it down,
girls,' I said, ... 'Sorry miss,' one of them said meekly. 'She's
drunk[!]. She don't normally talk like that.' A likely story.
But intriguing. So some teenagers do realise that they're not
supposed to swear. Let's hope they won't be reading J.K. Rowling's
The Casual Vacancy, published to great fanfare this week. ... The
novel has what my children call 'bad grown-up words' on every other
page. ... it's a self-righteous piece of liberal propaganda. ... I
am truly sick of seeing the sort of four-letter words that J.K.
Rowling spouts like sparks from Voldemort's wand. They're becoming
every-day chit-chat" [Viv Groskop, Mail on Sunday, 30
"Today the rebellion of
women against male domination is well under way among the
intellectual classes; but among the general public it is by no means
so far advanced. Nevertheless, the ferment has started to work.
Among its manifestations is a determined, dignified insistence by
women that they too have a right to be ordained to the priesthood.
This idea has sent shudders through the Establishment of the
Christian Church. One of the objections raised to the ordination of
women has been that priestesses were associated with the old faiths
of paganism and that their reappearance in the Church would somehow
be a step backwards towards these faiths. This idea is, of course,
quite correct, except that pagans would deny that it was a step
backwards" [Doreen Valiante, The Rebirth of Witchcraft, 1990,
"In addition to misrepresenting sex, porn is reducing women to
objects. And children. It shocks me that after all these years of
women screaming about their feminist rights, they allow their little
girls to reduce themselves into whores"
"Don't look like trash,
don't get drunk, don't be sick down your front, don't break your
heels and stagger about in the wrong clothes at midnight. This is
bad. I promise it is better to look after yourself properly ...
don't be sick in the gutter at midnight in a silly dress with no
money to get a taxi home because somebody will take advantage of you
- either rape you, or they'll knock you on the head or they'll rob
you" [Joanna Lumley, speaking at M&S campaign launch, quoted in
Mail on Sunday, 27 January 2013].
"All religions are
agreed that when women behave badly, it signifies the end of
civilization, which also of course is why most feminists deeply hate
religion, except [for] the sick feminist pagan kind [of religion],
which glorifies women and makes out God is a woman, 'a divine
feminist'." [comment at
"Fighting and killing an
enemy in close combat is not a right nor an opportunity... It is a
gut-churning, traumatic, incredibly tough job"
[Colonel Richard Kemp
warns against putting women soldiers into frontline combat roles,
Mail on Sunday, 11 May 2014].
"It turns out that Yes
sometimes means No too, particularly when a woman is judged to be
too inebriated to be capable of making a conscious decision. ...
Even if she has said Yes and even undressed herself or initiated the
sexual advances. Even if she at no point suggested she had changed
her mind or asked the man to stop. Even if she blatantly enjoyed
herself at the time. This is patently absurd. And yet this is
precisely what the DPP has announced. Unlike any other offence,
where the onus is on the prosecution to prove that the accused is
guilty of a crime, this puts the responsibility squarely (if not
fairly) on the shoulders of the accused to prove that he is
innocent. In one fell swoop, [the DPP] has turned a fundamental
principle of our justice system - the presumption of innocence - on
its head" [source].
"#PissForEquality was a
Twitter campaign intended to dupe Feminists to wet themselves in the
name of Equality, and to post photos. Sure enough, the non-thinking
collectivists fell for it... it is precisely this group of blinded
zombies - who call themselves 'norm critics', and with their
gender-neutral toy campaigns, [who] meta-politically are deciding
the future of our children"
"I was very active in
the Libertarian Party (both national and state level) for about
eight years, maybe ten, ending somewhere in the mid-to late '80s.
Libertarian rhetoric is long on the individual's rights and
freedoms, but short on responsibilities and obligations toward
fellow citizens/human beings. Libertarians, by and large, don't seem
to have heard of the Social Contract or very much else other than
'me, me, me'. Interestingly, this was the lament of each and
every WOMAN active in the LP that I talked to during my period of
party activity" [comment at
"Anybody with an
internet connection knows there are reports ... about the rape
epidemic sweeping our countries, especially the Scandinavian ones.
... Where are the 'third-wave' feminists when girls as young as
twelve are gang-raped by members of the 'Asian' ... community?
Nowhere to be seen. ... That is the hypocrisy of the metro-left,
especially the female metro-left, a hypocrisy which literally stinks
to heaven. ... When will we take the 'third-wave' feminists to task
for their hypocrisy, their self-aggrandisement, their delusions and
their hard-heartedness on the face of multiple rapes, in all nations
in the EU who 'open their arms' to the hijrah 'migrants'?
"This was discussed on Woman's Hour this morning on BBC Radio 4. Two
experts were on plus the interviewer who was shamelessly pro the
female lawyer..." / "These [BBC] female
presenters are wilfully blind, wilfully obtuse when it comes to the
lives of any woman, any age, not falling within their own, narrow
definition of what is now deemed to be properly 'feminist'"
"What I find especially
sickening is the cool and disturbing disregard they show towards all
those who have been and are really raped and killed, across the EU,
by the acolytes of that certain religion we mustn't mention. They
are so wrapped up in their own 'feminist' importance that they do
not see how their fake outrage plays into the hands of those who'd
rather have all of them wrapped up in burkhas"
"I find it hard to find
the words to express my contempt for that stunningly silly girl who
made such a fuss about the man's compliment. I think she had that
photograph taken by a professional who took a lot of trouble with
the lighting, the angle, the positioning of her head, and used all
his/her photographic skills to create an image of the girl looking
her very best. It didn't just happen. If she wanted to ensure that
no one looked twice at her her photograph and paid her no
compliments, why didn't she do a selfie of herself first thing in
the morning, bleary-eyed, no make-up, no exquisitely coiffed hair,
and stick THAT on Linked-In?"
"This girl (I call her 'girl' because she has behaved like a spoilt
brat) is a hypocrite of the worst kind who knows little or nothing
of how a woman can really suffer at the hands of a wicked man. A
real woman with a sense of humour, common sense, and self-possession
would either have ignored his comment or simply said 'Thank you'
without behaving as if he proposed to rape her. I have no patience
with such females" [comment at
"If she doesn't want
anyone to look at her and think she's attractive, the next logical
step is to don a head-to-foot burkha with only a little grille to
look through so she doesn't fall flat on her face. The way we're
heading in the this country and Europe generally, she might be
ordered to dress exactly like that in the not-too-distant future and
learn what sexism, chauvinism, and sheer misogyny are REALLY about"
"[T]his madame, and all of her ilk, are thorough cowards. They
flit around on the internet, don't talk to anybody out in the shops,
pubs, public transport, anywhere. They stick to their very select
own because the feminised men in their group are thoroughly cowed by
them ... I have no words to express how much I despise them"
"From what I can gather,
the breakdown in the link between rights and responsibilities seems
to have started with women's suffrage, which was opposed for a very
long time by many women who were very aware of the historical
connection between the right to vote and the responsibility to serve
in the military during wartime. They didn't want that particular
responsibility so they didn't want the right that required it. I
assume they took for granted that this link couldn't be broken. It
seems as though the right to vote was eventually granted to women
without any formalised corresponding connection. This connection
seemed to be totally destroyed after WWII with the baby boomer
generation, though the Greatest Generation appears to be the one
that allowed it to happen. I don't know at this point if there's any
way to reestablish the link between rights and responsibilities
without civilizational collapse or at least [a] major
social/political disaster like a WWIII"
"Look at what [womens']
emotional outlook has done to politics. Look at how they've segued
from relying on their husbands for moral guidance and maintenance to
the state. The state has no real interest in women's welfare except
as a constituency to manipulate - and oh, how easy it is to
manipulate women who would prefer totalitarian government to the
God-ordained loving counsel of a man who loves her. In her escape
from her ordained role, she has successfully emasculated men and
made of herself a slave to an uncaring tyrant. ... Europe slides
into cataclysm because both men and women have forsaken their
God-given roles. Buying into the cultural Marxist, post-modern
narrative, they have NO defenses against the wicked designs of the
elite who are using and abusing said naifs [naive persons] - and
emasculated men - as fodder for Islamic carnage"
Gender Roles and the Feminisation of Men
"[O]ur society's current
and one-sided approach to gender rights is now desperately out-dated
and socially destructive. ... [We need to h]ave respect for
traditional masculine and feminine roles. In recent years there has
been an underlying assumption that the traditional roles of the
sexes are somehow morally wrong and in need of change. However most
men want to be providers for their families and most women want to
be nurturers - and there is nothing whatsoever wrong with that"
"Feminists have managed
to completely turn American society on its rear end, creating the
chaotic that the nation is drowning in today. The workplace, the
arts, the churches and the schools have been feminised to the point
of no return. The average male character on network TV is a weak
twerp who hardly can spell his name. ... As a former middle and high
school teacher, I've witnessed the feminist destruction of the
nation's schools. In fact, the K-12 education world has been taken
over by feminists and women ... While these policies and social
changes are harmful to American society, they are the death knell
for the US military. ... The military will eventually lose men like
the education world. Eventually, men don't want to be around a
feminised environment. Feminists will scream dinosaur! Equal
opportunity! But there is no equal opportunity on a battlefield.
Under the guise of equal opportunity, the warrior culture is
becoming extinct. Under the guise of equal opportunity the
feminisation of the US military is beginning to endanger us all"
"The oddest aspect of the EU's open
borders policy and the BBC's support for it is that the left-liberal
elites which have been busily feminising European manhood have now
opened their arms (well, our arms, actually) to hordes of the most
unreconstructed, hairy-chested, misogynistic, male chauvinists on
the planet. The EU plans to force publicly-listed companies to
reserve 40% of their board seats for women (inevitably the BBC has
signalled its virtue by announcing a 50% quota by 2020) - while
leaving European women vulnerable to attacks by testosterone-charged
young men from relatively primitive cultures where an uncovered
female head is regarded as an open invitation to abuse. Is there
something about the unfettered masculinity of these recent arrivals
that awakens atavistic urges in those liberals who have created a
society in their metrosexual image?"
"Note [in this video]
how the [immigrant] bully threatens to beat [the German boy] every
day just to harden him up and make him a man. ... He doesn't know it
yet, but his mother and sisters are now Moslem chattel property. He
won't lift a finger to defend German women; he is a dhimmi at best.
Most likely he will convert as a matter of bare survival, but he
will always be a 'second-class Muslim', even if he submits. These
IslamoNazi bullies will have him reciting the Shahada in less than a
month, and after that, his sister is toast. Just fresh meat for the
hijra jihadis ... The German boy now understands who are the Alpha
males, and who are not: The Moslems are, and he isn't. ... If Islam
wins in Europe ... all of the German girls and women (even the
man-hating radical feminists and lesbians) will be raped, enslaved,
or 'married' by force [and] there will be a rising generation of
Muslims in Europe who are half-German"
"The European has
succumbed to sixty years of Leftist indoctrination which has
completely emasculated the European male and inculcated him in a
slave morality. The Moslem male is instilled in turn with a Master
morality and is educated from childhood that individuality and life
have no value and that death in conquest of infidels is the greatest
honor. The Moslem is taught that death in battle is the greatest
reward with great treasures in the afterlife; while the European is
taught that everything is relative and nothing is worth fighting for
- certainly nothing is worth dying for"
"Having taken over the
education systems of Europe, the Left have prepared their populace
for conquest and turned them into brainwashed sheep who baw and bray
as their women are raped, groped and impregnated by foreign
invaders. Nothing is worth fighting for; natural inclinations to
defend one's territory and people have been eradicated"
"The European male has been reduced to nothing better than a eunuch
ready to guard the harems of their Islamic masters who will make
whores of their wives, mothers and daughters. The European male has
no dignity any longer, no pride, no core beliefs, no faith in God"
"In America, we still
have a chance ... We will not let these metrosexual eunuchs
undermine us with their bathroom laws and other perversions ... We
will continue to cling to our Bible and guns as the traitor Obamao
so aptly observed because that is what will ensure our freedom from
Leftist slavery and surrender to the Islamic juggernaut that is
snuffing out the world in its noxious cloud of hate"
"All too often we try to
overturn God's perfect order and then wonder why our emasculated
menfolk are not like the men of God in Scripture"
the Unofficial Guide: Overview, (5th Revision, 2004), Endnote
"It is impossible but that
offenses will come: but woe unto him, through whom they come! It
were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and
he cast into the sea, than that he should offend one of these little
ones" (Luke 17:1-2)
"The spread of pedophilia within the
political establishment is in fact very severe, and has been exposed
in Great Britain. In Germany, the 'Pedo-Sexual' movement is also
very strong within the political aristocracy. This is being
expressed meta-politically as well, The Cultural Marxist online
magazine SALON recently published the piece: 'I'm a
pedophile, but not a monster', in an effort to normalise it. The
children are the future. And that is exactly why the Elite are out
to destroy them, ... We have witnessed what the Elite, through the
normalization process, have done through Cultural Marxism; a
brainwash so severe that it rivals even the worst case of Wahhabism"
Freedom of Speech and
Government's plans for EDOs seem to be so broadly defined that they
risk jeopardizing the free speech of those who support traditional
marriage. In a letter to one of his constituents in July, Mark
Spencer MP stated that the new measures would be used to stop
teachers from teaching that gay marriage is wrong. Mr Spencer's
letter followed suggestions from Education Secretary Nicky Morgan
that if a pupil believes that 'homosexuality is wrong', it could
raise extremism alarms. In September, there were comments on the
Today programme from one of the front-line staff responsible for
implementing 'Prevent', part of the Government's counter-terrorism
strategy. Polly Harrow, Head of Safeguarding and Prevent at Kirklees
College in West Yorkshire, said the Government's approach seeks 'not
just tolerance, but acceptance of difference and others' and that
although people can believe homosexuality is wrong - 'if you speak
it out loud you might be breaking the law'. Before he became Justice
Minister, Dominic Raab MP said: 'Those engaged in passionate debates
- such as Christians objecting to gay marriage - could find
themselves slapped down'. On the current evidence he might well be
right" [Are You An 'Extremist' For Supporting Marriage?,
Christian Institute Newsletter, Autumn 2015].
extended extract is from the article:
A De-Sexed Society is a De-Humanised Society
"As usual, tyranny comes disguised as
'civil rights'. ...
The transgender movement has never
been about 'gender'. It's all about sex. Sex is the real target.
'Gender' is merely the politicized linguistic vehicle that
facilitates a legal ban on sex distinctions. There aren't a whole
lot of dots to connect to uncover the logic of where this leads: if
you abolish sex distinctions in law, you can abolish state
recognition of biological family lies, and the state can regulate
personal relationships and consolidate power as never before.
Physical reality exists independent
of 'gender identity non-discrimination' law - or any man-made
law. Laws have no power to make reality go away, but they can change
how people behave in response to reality. They can enforce
disregard for reality through speech protocols, social and
economic pressures, invasions of privacy, and thought policing. ...
Gender ideology is an effective tool.
Cultural Marxists use it to corrupt language and sow confusion,
especially among children. ...
Getting free people to reject freedom
may seem a tall order. How, you might ask, could people ever be
convinced to let go of their families and consent to such a
dystopian social structure? How do you get public opinion on board
with an agenda that leads them to deny the reality of their own
humanity? There are lots of pieces to this puzzle, including the
erosion of social trust, the breakdown of family, social
polarization, and growing ignorance of history. But the groundwork
has been laid over a long period of time.
- Virtually all outlets of
communication had to be on board - Hollywood, academia, the
- All medical personnel,
particularly mental health personnel, had to be 'educated' to
comply with the transgender program or risk losing their
- The educational establishment
had to imbue schoolchildren with the ideology. Check.
- Large corporations had to get on
board as stakeholders and enforcers. Check.
- And, of course, the push to
legally de-sex society had to be embedded - Trojan Horse style -
within a slightly less alien idea, with the slick slogan
'marriage equality'. Check.
- Churches had to be brought on
board so that even religion became a conduit for anti-truth.
- Social, emotional, and economic
pressures had to be established to censure anyone who dared to
question the wisdom of it all. Check.
- Any such person had to be
labelled a bigot, a hater, and a non-person. Check.
At this point, the most primal and
universal of human fears comes into play: the fear of being socially
rejected. Self-censorship takes off. People start falsifying what
they believe, until they eventually don't even know what they
believe anymore. Nobody can talk openly to one another. In the end,
it's as though we are each being marched into a separate solitary
confinement cell. That's what happens when free association takes a
hit, when the state severs particular relationships in the name of a
collective togetherness. Then, when we can't verify reality with one
another anymore - because we are so afraid of being ostracized - we
end up living in an age of mass delusion.
The only way out is to affirm
reality ... Let's start by reinjecting our language with one very
good word that points to reality: sex. Yes, let's revive the word
'sex', and use it generously whenever referring to the biological
reality of our physical nature. (And spiritual nature too.) At
the same time, let's refuse - always - to use the word 'gender' when
we mean sex. It's a poisoned and weaponized word that has been used
to legally de-sex and thus dehumanize us all. We must work together
[EMcD: 'collectively', let's
say] to resist its deception"
[End of Extract]
extended extract is from the
The Origin of 'Identity Politics' & 'Political Correctness'
(sometimes dubbed 'political correctness') is the result of a
political-Left major backlash against the mass of ordinary people
(in Europe and 'the West'), beginning in the 1920s/30s, in the wake
of the persistent failure of Marxist theory to be realised in
European 'revolution' or any real change through democracy. In
shifting the blame away from Marxist theory and those gullible
enough to adhere to it, and on to those the theory had prescribed
and predicted would have been the beneficiaries, if only they had
responded accordingly ('the [white, male] workers'); then the
cognitive-dissonance within the political-left mindset caused by
this crisis to an extent was salved"
"As with any fervent ideology, a
hallmark of the political-Left is interpreting anything and
everything in its own ideological terms to claim as a manifestation
of the ideology and its prophecy - jumping on a bandwagon, so to
speak; though here only to hijack it. The bandwagon here was, of
course, the American civil rights movement, which though enjoying
ubiquitous support within black communities - to the point often of
various forms of extremism - featured virtually nil endorsement of
socialism ... It is from the time of this co-option that 'identity
politics' dates; many considering that the movement was incorporated
into the Left in the wake of King's assassination in 1968 - the
major turning-point year in political-Left politics generally"
"'Civil rights', as the first great
'single-issue' campaign, served not least to provide an acceptable
cloak for the Left to avoid provoking a resurgence of McCarthysim.
The major social upheaval of 'civil rights' with its large-scale and
widespread rioting was easily the nearest thing in then recent US
history to look like the promised Marxist 'revolution', and
obviously was just the practical application the 'theory' was
seeking. Moreover, the protagonists (black Americans) were eminently
separable form the now despised 'workers' per se, in being
presentable as a new 'group; from outside of the former fray of
'boss' versus 'worker'.
"This accident of history served to
add 'black' to 'woman' as 'the new oppressed' ... 'The worker' in
effect was retrospectively stereotyped as both 'man' and 'white'.
With the inverse of this stereotype of 'white' being not just 'black
American' but 'black' - that is, ethnic-minority generically ... so
it was that the new 'agents of social change' / 'disadvantaged' /
'oppressed' were extended from women to also include all ethnic
"It is only with the knowledge of how
this developed that sense can be made of why ethnicity is held above
the myriad other possible differences that could be utilised as
in-group markers, when in fact there is nothing inherent in
ethnicity as an in-group marker to produce inter-group prejudice
that is particularly more pernicious"
"Indeed, the worst inter-communal
conflicts nominally between different ethnicities usually are
between different cultural heritages with no discernible 'racial'
differences of any kind - and what (non-ethnic) differences there
are can be minimal; the lack of contrast actually fuelling the
intensity of conflict, such is the need for groups to feel
distinguished from each other"
"Furthermore, ethnic prejudice is
anything but restricted to or even predominantly 'white' on 'black':
inter-ethnic (eg, 'black' on Asian) and ethnic-on-'white' 'racism'
can be, often is and may usually be the greater problem; and a
negative attitude to a certain ethnicity does not imply a similar
attitude to other ethnicities"
"The specific US experience, given
the highly divisive politics in the wake of the American Civil War
over the basis of the Southern US economy in African slavery, does
not translate to elsewhere; notably not to Europe - as was starkly
evidenced in the experience of World War II 'black' American GIs
stationed in England in how they were favourably received by locals,
who sided with them when discriminated against"
"'Racial divides' in European 'white'
host countries are the result not of mutual antipathy but
affiliative forces, principally within migrant enclaves and
secondarily within the 'host' community; in both cases being through
in-group 'love', not out-group 'hate'"
[EMcD: though the latter
part of this observation is indeed true in normal circumstances,
this does not, of course, take account of the Islamic/Koranic
doctrines of Al-Hijra (Immigration), Taqiyya (Lying and Deceit), and Razzia/Ghazwa
(Rape and Slavery), Dawa (Cultural and Stealth Jihad), and Terrorist
and Violent Jihad, carried out by fundamentalist Muslims as
they settle in increasing numbers in Western countries with the sole
purpose of making every remaining Dar al-Harb ('House of War': i.e.
any non-Muslim country) into a Dar al-Islam ('House of Submission': i.e all Muslim countries) until Islam finally achieves its
longed-for global Caliphate.]
[End of Extract]
"The Frankfurt School
believed that as long as an individual had the belief - or even the
hope of belief - that his divine gift of reason could solve the
problems facing society, then that society would never reach the
state of hopelessness and alienation that they considered necessary
to provoke socialist revolution.
Their task, therefore, was as
swiftly as possible to undermine the Judaeo-Christian legacy. To do
this they called for the most negative destructive criticism
possible of every sphere of life which would be designed to
de-stabilize society and bring down what they saw as the
'oppressive' order. Their policies, they hoped, would spread like a
virus - 'continuing the work of Western Marxists by other means' as
one of their members noted.
To further the advance
of their 'quiet' cultural revolution ... the [Frankfurt] School
recommended (among other things):
(1) the creation of racism
(2) continual change to create confusion,
(3) the teaching
of sex and homosexuality to children,
(4) the undermining of
schools' and teachers' authority,
(5) huge immigration to destroy
(6) the promotion of excessive drinking,
(7) emptying of
(8) an unreliable legal system with bias against victims
(9) dependency on the state or state benefits,
control and dumbing down of media,
(11) encouraging the breakdown of
One of the main ideas
of the Frankfurt School was to exploit Freud's idea of 'pansexualism'
- the search for pleasure, the exploitation of the differences
between the sexes, the overthrowing of traditional relationships
between men and women. To further their aims they would:
the authority of the father, deny the specific roles of father and
mother, and wrest away from families their rights as primary
educators of their children,
(b) abolish differences in the
education of boys and girls,
(c) abolish all forms of male dominance
- hence the presence of women in the armed forces,
(d) declare women
to be an 'oppressed class' and men as 'oppressors'."
eight levels of control that must be obtained before you are able to
create a social state:
Healthcare - Control healthcare and you control the
Poverty - Increase the Poverty level as high as
possible, poor people are easier to control and will not fight
back if you are providing everything for them to live;
- Increase the debt to an unsustainable level. That wa6y you are
able to increase taxes, and this will produce more poverty;
Control - Remove the ability to defend themselves from
the Government. That way you are able to create a police state;
Welfare - Take control of every aspect of their lives
(Food, Housing, and Income);
Education - Take control of that people read and listen
to - take control of what children learn in school;
Religion - Remove the belief in God from the Government
Class Warfare - Divide the people into the wealthy and
the poor. This will cause more discontent and it will be easier
to take from (tax) the wealthy with the support of the poor" [source].
"Woe unto them that call evil
good, and good evil;
that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that
put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!
Woe unto them that are wise in their own eyes, and prudent in their own sight!"
God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he
male and female created he them"
"...women rule over them.
O my people, they which lead thee cause thee to err,
and destroy the way of thy paths"
"But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in
it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck,
and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea"
note that the inclusion of any quotation or item on this page does not
imply we would necessarily endorse the source from which the extract is
taken; neither can we necessarily vouch for any other materials by the
or any groups or
ministries or websites with which they may be associated, or any
periodicals to which they may contribute, or the
beliefs of whatever kind they may hold, or any other aspect of their
work or ministry or position.