Disgraceful BBC Close Down Help for Jab Victims  (16 September 2022)

"The BBC has plumbed new depths in its crusade to prop-up the crumbling Covid narrative.  An intervention by the Corporation will prevent vaccine-injured groups sharing help and information ... Thousands of vaccine-injured have been subjected to constant online censorship, so in desperation they developed a code of emojis to replace key words and beat the Big Tech algorithms.  Now the BBC, shamefully, boasts of exposing this ruse ... the BBC ... might want to consider an alternative funeral that will take place next week.  There will be no national mourning, no wall-to-wall coverage; it will be a quiet affair for a young man who took his own life, unable to cope with the debilitating symptoms caused by a Covid jab..."

BBC Boasts It Got Vaccine Injured Support Group with 250,000 Members Removed from Facebook  (16 September 2022)

"I wonder if Parliament's champion of the vaccine injured Sir Christopher Chope has anything to say about this?  He is just about to launch a new All Party Parliamentary Group on COVID-19 Vaccine Damage ... The BBC and Facebook ... don't believe that these injuries exist, or at least that the injured should be allowed to speak to one another and seek mutual support.  Is that why these people pay their license fee - so the BBC can go round banning their support groups?..."

Readers' Comments

"This must be a new low even for the BBC.  I can't get over just how unbelievably cruel this treatment of vaccine injury victims is.  No amount of ignoring them is going to make these people disappear and if the BBC are scared of encouraging vaccine hesitancy then they don't need to worry as the dangers and ineffectiveness of this vaccine are doing that all by themselves" [source].

"[T]he BBC, the Twatter blob, the pRedditors etc [are] petulant, effeminate, spoiled little children.  They scream and shout when anything doesn't go their way, boast about their censorship of others yet cry when anyone counters their stories with facts"  /  "[I]t would never occur to me to have the breathtaking audacity to tell someone who is suffering either personally or following the death of a loved one that they are lying or making things up.  How utterly heartless and shameless ... if they really want to deal with 'disinformation' do not silence people, show us the proof!"  /  "If you are still paying your license fee, you are funding state propaganda.  If you are still paying your licence fee, you are funding the maiming and death of children.  If you are still paying your license fee, you are part of the problem"  /  "I admit I am impressed with the BBC's tenacity in sticking to its lies.  If you still pay the license fee but don't like the BBC then ask yourself how long you are prepared to continue funding a state propaganda machine that has so much contempt for you it will urge you to take a deadly injection while demanding money from you for the privilege of letting them brainwash you about how good it is"  /  "We don't have mandated BBC telescreens yet, but unless we resist, it is only a matter of time"

Unvaccinated

Discussing the BBC's Documentary: Unvaccinated, aired on 20 July 2022  (Please note the comments below the line of this youtube)

A Critique of the BBC2 Documentary Unvaccinated  (22 July 2022)

"The programme turned out to be every bit as bad and biased as feared ... Below we summarise our key concerns and what was missing:

• Claim of 4 million UK adults unvaccinated: ...
• Failure to disclose the Pfizer links of the two key experts (Finn and Khalil) on the programme: ...
• Failure to disclose the background to FullFact.org: ...
• No challenge to the many explicit false claims made: ...
• The jellybeans game: ...
• No mention of the failure of the vaccination to stop infection or transmission of covid: ...
• Failure to humanize any actual vaccination victims: ...
• The ludicrous and misleading MMR vaccination anecdote: ...
• No challenge to the powerful claim that 20 out of 21 ICU patients art St. George's hospital in Dec 2021 were unvaccinated: ...
• Failure to mention reported data on adverse reactions: ...
• No mention of the true risk of covid based on world wide date: ...
• No mention of the way covid data are by definition fixed to exaggerate cases numbers, hospitalizations, deaths as well as vaccine efficacy and safety: ...
• No mention of the lack of long-term safety data: ...
• No mention of all the protocol violations now known in the main Pfizer trial: ...
• No mention of the international data showing strong evidence the vaccine is neither effective nor safe: ...
• What was Hannah Fry's involvement in the stat/maths modelling?..."

Patronising, Selective, Abusive - the Vaccine Propaganda Machine At Its Worst  (22 July 2022)

"One thing I will say about Wednesday night's BBC programme Unvaccinated is that it had be seen to be believed.  It managed to be patronising, ignorant, selective and abusive all at the same time ... Unvaccinated was a programme whereby the BBC picked a group of people who have exercised their right to medical choice and bodily autonomy and decided not to be injected with an mRNA 'vaccine', and got them together, Big Brother-style, in an attempt to change their minds.  They were subject to a regime of gaslighting, 'heated debate' and an odd jelly-bean experiment..."

Unvaccinated - A Journalistic Travesty from the BBC  (22 July 2022)

"In their wisdom, the BBC decided to address the 'problem' of the unvaccinated on Wednesday ... If you thought that this might finally have been an acknowledgement from our national broadcasting Big Brother that it should explore the reasons why some of us are unvaccinated, stop right there.  As ever with the BBC, it skewed and deceived from the start with a pre-broadcast promotional claim that only 8% of the population took this radical decision.  Thank goodness for the determination of Professor Norman Fenton who challenged this absurd assertion, shown to be way off the mark by the inimitable Dr Clare Craig earlier this month..."

VIDEO:  UK Column News  (22 July 2022)

"Unvaccinated with Prof. Hannah Fry" (08:40 - 29:14):  The BBC's latest marketing campaign for Big Pharma.

VIDEO:  Hannah Fry BBC Unvaccinated Coinkydink  (22 July 2022)

Viewers' comments:  "Clearly heavily edited and the main thing was to make the people involved look a bit odd and off the wall"  /  "They have a huge problem, and that problem is the control group. They can claim that there's only 3m, but they can't alter the fact that the control group is really at least 10 times higher than that ... and that they are healthy precisely because they are unvaccinated"  /  "The BBC wanted to get across that:

• Myocarditis is rare, not that bad and clears up in its own - who acres if kids and young people suffer heart attacks?
• Nobody cares if you or your loved one are one of the unlucky ones getting serious harm/death from the jab,
• The unspeared are more likely to die of covid in ICU.  We withhold any context of the people cherry-picked as unjabbed covid patients such as any co-morbidities, age, obesity, or if they were already in hospital with another condition unrelated to covid when they tested positive
• Lack of long-term trial data is an inconvenient fact we can all skim over,
• The ingredients of the concoction are as follows: synthetic mRNA.  Nothing else whatsoever,
• Blood clots were only associated with AstraZeneca (in some age groups) and that's all been rectified,
• Jabs are safe and effective, as per the fact-checks,
• We can ignore the fact that these people (on the programme) are alive without help from a jab, including the pregnant lady who had a flu-like illness that tested positive whislt pregnant and had a healthy baby,
• There are no cases of miscarriage or stillborns after the jabs.  None whatsoever to mention.  Yellow card scheme - what's that?
• Healthy young 28 y/o women can have a stroke, 3 heart attacks and a seizure, it's normal and nothing to do with an injection 5 days prior,
• Natural immunity is not worth a mention,
• No health professionals, immunologists, epidemiologists or anybody credible disagrees with what we've told or shown you, none at all,
• Anyone spending 1.5 years saying no to the jabs must have their minds changed, they can't be left alone,
• There's plenty more, but that sums it up to some extent..."

Prof Hannah Fry ... Also Presented Contagion: The Pandemic in 2018.  Two Years Pre-Covid.  Coincidence...  (21 July 2022)

"Within the last week a lot of noise has been appearing on Social Media about the BBC documentary Unvaccinated.  The Daily Mail called it groundbreaking.  I call it propaganda.  If you were fortunate enough to miss it here is a brief synopsis according to the Daily Mail ... The standard anti-vax slur and ad hominem attacks trying to make people look stupid with their concerns.  A tried and tested BBC propaganda tactic they have been using ad nauseam for years ... I also had massive concerns about Prof Hannah Fry who was presenting.  I found out some amazing stuff about Prof Fry ... Why would anyone appear on a BBC show when [the BBC has] pushed the vax agenda relentlessly with no journalistic balance?  As we know the BBC have received tens of millions [of pounds] from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.  We know where their allegiances lie..."

BBC's 'Vaccine Expert' Just Happens to be in Charge of Pfizer's Vaccine Centre  (21 July 2022)

"[N]either the participants nor the viewers were told of the crucial Pfizer links of these experts.  This was an appalling omission by the BBC.  Moreover, when speaking about the US pharma companies Pfizer ad Moderna in the programme, Prof Adam Finn stated that he 'acted as a buffer between them and the public' implying some kind of independent role.  This is a remarkable statement given his position below..."

Unvaccinated Review: Painfully Patronising Documentary Treated Vaccine Sceptics as Idiots  (20 July 2022)

"The BBC set out to prove wrong, rather than fairly represent, the views of Britain's 4m [sic] unvaccinated Adults.  It must have seemed like a good idea at the time.  Someone at the BBC decided that one way to demonstrate the corporation's commitment to impartiality would be to make a programme featuring people who have declined to have the Covid vaccine.  But the result was so patronising that they shouldn't have bothered ... Prof Hannah Fry was the host, there 'to discuss the issues and their views.'  What this really meant was that Fry would try to change their minds by explaining to these people, in a lovely, soft tone of voice, that they were wrong..."

The Farcical BBC Promise a Fake Documentary on a Topic They Won't Touch with a Barge Pole  (13 July 2022)

"[I]t is with a certain degree of mirth that we now learn from the BBC that it intends to air a 'documentary' about a phenomenon it has already opted to call 'vaccine hesitancy.'  A 'documentary' is a 'film or television or radio programme that gives facts and information about a subject' ... The deprecatory word 'hesitant' means 'tentative, unsure, or slow in acting.'  There is no room in the programme-makers' minds for the possibility that people who chose to remain 'unvaccinated' have considered the risk-benefit of these shots, have looked at the available evidence and have decisively concluded that they don't want a COVID-19 jab ... it seems the chance of [the BBC's programme] providing a balanced exploration of the issue is remote to non-existent ... As a state propaganda operation, all it can do is parrot the official narrative spouted by the government and its partners, who are, in this instance, the pharmaceutical corporations..."

New BBC 'Documentary' About the Unvaccinated, Already Shown to be Inaccurate Weeks Before Airing  (09 July 2022)

"Unvaccinated Citizens, your reconditioning treatment has been scheduled for 20 July, 9pm on BBC2.  Please make sure you attend or we will reduce your social credit score by 200 points.  I joke...  I hope. ... I will watch the programme next Wednesday and hope, for the sake of the BBC, that it is in fact unbiased and shows both sides of the argument.  It claims that it will explore 'viewpoints in an open and sensitive way.'  However, I don't hold out much hope ... Already it sounds less like a documentary and more like an unvaccinated reconditioning experiment...."

Vaccines: The Disinformation War

Discussing the BBC's Panorama Programme:  Vaccines: The Disinformation War, aired on 15 February 2021

YOUTUBE:  Defund the BBC and Gain Your Freedom  (21 February 2021)

"Following the now notorious Panorama episode, let's look at the BBC license fee, history and why it should be replaced with a subscription service instead"  /  Viewers' comments:  "Whenever I catch TV news at other peoples' houses I find it an insult to my sense and my intelligence ... The normalization of such vile propaganda is so unhealthy. I saw someone likening it to inviting the world's greatest hypnotist into your living room and allowing [him] to talk to you unfettered for hours each day. I found this to be rather apt"  /  "Panorama was a joke"  /  "I don't have a TV but i hear it was just naked propaganda"

BRANDNEWTUBE:  We Will Not Be Silenced: Ask the Experts II  (20 February 2021)

"Ask the Experts II provides a platform to some of the world's most outspoken and heavily censored medical professionals to express their views on the validity of the global pandemic, the safety & efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines, masks, and the other other precautionary measures that have been so readily integrated into our everyday lives"  /  Viewers' comments:  "Thank you for your integrity and dedication to freedom of speech"  /  "Thank you for this. The corruption is out of control and needs to be reined in. Thank you for your professional points of view. Most professionals have been gagged and blackmailed into losing their jobs"  /  "The truth is being silenced about the side effects of this vaccine"  /  "Thank you for your efforts. I sincerely hope this video will be widespread around the world to wake people up ... without understanding the agenda behind all this, we will never fully understand what is happening ... Don't shy away from learning about history and secret societies and see how all of this has happened throughout history ... there is a very dark agenda behind all this"

YOUTUBE:  BBC Panorama: A Review  (15 February 2021)

"The show followed some people who had seen a video by doctors online talking about the vaccine - and it was the usual way of doing things:  (a) Oh look, here are some people who are confused by what they have seen online, And then by the end, (b) they have all seen the light, and got the jab..."  /  Viewers' comments:  "'My people perish for lack of knowledge' (Hosea 4:1)"  /  "The good old British Brainwashing Corporation"  /  "BBC propaganda at it again. You'd think even the most gullible of people would questioning all of this by now..."  /  "The wise will see through the propaganda, unfortunately the sheep probably won't"  /  "The same BBC that covered up for Jimmy Savile? Got it."  /  "Vaccine hesitancy must be high of they pull cards like this one. People are getting clued up finally. This is a desperate call on behalf of the BBC propaganda machine"  /  "This was their big chance to show both sides and they snuffed it just like they do with everything else"  /  If the BBC are selling it, the opposite is true.  The narrative is being threatened. They are on the backfoot, the public are seeing the truth"  /  "Pointless watching, as you know they are protecting the government's failing narrative. The BBC would never do a balanced debate"

"Ah lovely. Calling anyone who has concerns with the jab an 'anti-vaxxer'. Classic name-calling"  /  "The BBC certainly wouldn't want a counter argument. Utterly pointless programme"  /  "Can't watch the BBC anymore. It's a lost cause"  /  "Sadly ... the majority absolutely believe the BBC and have probably heard very little in the way of opposition"  /  "A great balanced insight into the corruption of our media and government"  /  "The will censor anyone who offers logical and scientific counter-claims. Or, in other words, anyone who speaks the truth"  /  "To be honest I doubt the BBC 'converted' anyone, because everyone who watches and believes the BBC and Panorama will already be fully signed up for the jab"  /  "My 120year-old could make a better documentary. it was like watching a school project!"  /  "How easily these people were fooled"  /  "Was shocked at how weak and biased it was"  /  "A hatchet job aimed only at discrediting doubters"  /  "Just predictable bias"  /  Those that are still asleep now after a year, will never wake up, and will believe everything the news tells them"  /  "Panorama was just playing their role, like in the Event 201 scenario"  /  "Only thing to do with the BBC is turn it off"

BBC Panorama: A Review  (15 February 2021)  [Transcript for video above]

"[E]ven for this propaganda station, this one was transparent ... There was no debate. None of these doctors appeared on the show. There was no actual analysing of the what some of these doctors are saying ... The BBC merely picked out small sound-bites that made it easy for them to try to demonise them ... They never covered the bigger picture, which sis the conflict of interest between politicians, scientists, and their connections to Big Pharma, and how it is in their financial interests ... It was a dumbed-down show which basically boiled down to: (1) these people are bad [the online doctors], and (2) these people are good [us]..."

YOUTUBE:  BBC: Vaccines: The Disinformation War  (15 February 2021)

"With millions now vaccinated, Panorama investigates [demonises and tries to silence] the scare tactics [evidenced-based and informed warnings (the BBC is here using a logical fallacy known as 'appeal to emotion')] of anti-vaxxers [watchmen, researchers, and questioners] - who are they [people using their critical faculties], and what are their motives for trying to deter people from getting the jab? [concern for the wellbeing of their fellow countrymen who are being used as unwitting guinea-pigs in phase 3 of the trials for experimental gene therapies].  Reporter [useful idiot] Marianna Spring reveals [misrepresents, aka the 'straw man' logical fallacy] the scale of a social media [alternative media to the corporate media] blitz [warning] that has targeted [reached out to - unlike the BBC which actually IS 'targeting'] vulnerable people [national populations with vital information about the dangers of these new 'vaccines'] and is now reaching young generations yet to be called for their vaccination [a generation which has no need whatsoever for vaccination against coronaviruses].

"We witness [manipulatively steer] the reaction of a test group exposed to [who watched] one anti-vax [alternative view-points from the BBC's - how did you describe it, BBC? Oh yes - "unrelenting" pro-vaccine narrative] video, all under the watchful eye of one of the UK's most respected doctors [whose university faculty is in receipt of millions of pounds from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. So, no conflict of interest then.  PS, BBC: there are many, many other equally "respected doctors" who hold a different, and evidence-based, opinion about the C19 vaccines from this particular doctor].  Will they be influenced [educated, informed] by disinformation [researched information which opposes the relentless pro-vaccine propaganda promoted by the "our charter doesn't allow us to campaign" BBC], or will their plans to be vaccinated remain unchanged? [Oh, BTW, did I forget to mention that the BBC also receives funding from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation?]."

YOUTUBE:  BBC Lies About Popularity of Covid Not A Vaccine  (15 February 2021)

"BBC's 'disinformation' officer Marianna Spring (MI5) tells a lie that Boris Johnson's ... coronavirus / covid 'jab' is really popular - offering zero evidence to back up the outrageous claim, but because [the BBC is] the Conservative propaganda mouthpiece, they will get away with this lie. This is to be part of a programme on BBC panorama looking into 'disinformation' - except, [that is], the disinformation by the BBC, Sky News, etc for the UK government.  The under 50s have no intention of taking Boris' Final Solution injection for his 'Great Reset' agenda.  [Recorded from BBC1 HD, BBC 1pm News, 15 February 2021]"

BRANDNEWTUBE:  "We Don't Debate with Anti-Vaxxers Whether They're Right or Wrong" Says BBC  (13 February 2021)

"When the BBC opens its mouth, it's the voice of Bill Gates we hear."

"We Don't Debate with Anti-Vaxxers Whether they're Right or Wrong" Says BBC  (13 February 2021)  [Transcript for video above]

"Around the world governments have continued to lie, to deceive and to create fear and the media has aided and abetted the lies. All debate has been suppressed and the many doctors and other practitioners who have spoken up and tried to share the truth have been abused and demonised and had their careers ruthlessly destroyed. The result is the the millions who doubt the Government's propaganda and who question the safety and efficacy of the jabs have been disenfranchised by the media.  No media organisation has, in my view, been more egregiously dishonest than the BBC which has exhibited staggering ignorance mixed with prejudice and has forgotten that its job is to report the news not to bend it. I am tired of them ignoring the science, avoiding debate and demonising those of us speaking the truth..."

BRANDNEWTUBE:  Ask the Experts  (07 December 2020)

Doctors in order of appearance are: Dr Andrew Kaufman, Dr Hilde De Smet, Dr Nils R Fosse, Dr Elizabeth Evans, Dr Mohammad Adil, Dr Vernon Coleman, Prof. Dolores Cahill, Dr R. Zac Cox, Dr Anna Forbes, Dr Ralf ER Sundberg, Dr Johan Denis, Dr Daniel Cullum, Moritz von der Borch, Dr Anne Fierlafijn, Dr Tom Cowan, Dr Kevin P. Corbett, Dr Carrie Madej, Dr Barre Landon, Natural nurse Kate Shemirani, Pharmacist Sandy Lunoe, Licensed Acupuncturist Boris Dragin, Dr Piotr Rubas, Dr Natalia Prego Cancelo, Dr Rashid Buttar, Dr Nour De San, Dr Kelly Brogan, Prof. Konatantin Pavlidis, Dr Sherri Tenpenny, Journalist Senta Depuydt, Dr Heiko Santelmann, Dr Margareta Griesz-Brisson, Dr Mikael Nordforsa, Dr Elk F. de Klerk.

What is Covid-19?

"Covid-19 is supposedly a pneumonia as a complication of SARS-COV-2, but ...

• For most people, Covid-19 is a mild illness which is never confirmed as being due to SARS-COV-2, but the perception of reality is created by official general prognosis,
• A developed SARS-COV-2 infection could be flu, or even a bacterial infection, and Covid-19, or the pneumonia associated with it, would in fact arise as a complication due to these other causations,
• Pneumonia or severe respiratory complications can occur from a treatment for cancer - which incriminates other pre-existing conditions in combination with their medical treatments,
• Meanwhile, quite astonishingly, there is no acknowledgement of what might be true Covid-19, which is an infection of the lungs related to the interaction between SARS-COV/SARS-COV-2 and Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 (ACE2) that is promoted in treatment by prescribed drugs.

"[T]he UK Government's reaction to Covid-19 has been way beyond anything anyone could call proportional. It has been unnecessarily, grotesquely exaggerated, and pointlessly damaging" [source].

Coronavirus Act: What Are We Consenting To?

"In the UK, it is worth recapping what it is we are consenting to with the Coronavirus Act:

• We consent to increased State surveillance of ourselves and our family;
• We are happy that we could be detained, without charge, because some state official suspects, or claims they suspect, we may be infected;
• It is fine with us that we or our loved ones can be sectioned under the Mental Health Act on the recommendation of a single doctor and neither we nor they need to have the protection of a second opinion we are locked up;
• We accept that the state can retain our biometric data and fingerprints for an extended period;
• We consent that jury trials are a bit of an anachronism and Judges can hear more evidence by video or even audio link;
• We think it's fine that the evidence required, and processes undertaken, to determine and record our or our loved ones' deaths can be eroded to the point where they can be registered by people with no medical or legal expertise at all;
• We don't think the NHS needs to adhere to practice standards or bother with assessing the needs of some patients, especially older people;
• We are also fine with the complete suspension of democracy in Britain;
• We accept all of this based upon a unique subset of scientific opinion which, contrary t every known scientific principle, can never be questioned;
• We agree with the MSM that people who question any aspect of the stories they tell us are dangerous because these people just don't care if their own loved ones die. Only true believers care about their families;
• We also accept the need for the State to invest considerable resources creating counter disinformation units whose purpose is to censor anything and everything which questions our firmly held beliefs. The beliefs informed by many of the same people doing the censoring..." [source].

Bayith Articles on C19

Fortifying Our Immune Systems for Winter  (July 2021)

Concerning Coronavirus Vaccines  (Dec 2020 / Jan 2021)   |   Covid-19 Vaccines: As in the Days of Noah  (Nov 2020)

A Bit of Dirt...  (Nov 2020)   |   Covid Conversations: Everyone Is Out of Step But Our Jock  (October 2020)   |   Rules Are Rules!  (Sept 2020)

Covid Conversations: An Apology and An Explanation  (Sept 2020)   |   Why I Don't Wear A Face-Mask  (Aug 2020)

Coming Out of Lockdown - Part Two: Hugs  (May 2020)   |   Coming Out of Lockdown - Part One: Rebuilding Our Immune Systems  (May 2020)

Wake Up, Folks...  (May 2020)   |   Our Place of Safety  (April 2020)

"He that dwelleth in the secret place of the most High shall abide under the shadow of the Almighty.
I will say of the LORD, He is my refuge and my fortress: my God; in Him will I trust.
Surely He shall deliver thee from the snare of the fowler, and from the noisome pestilence.
He shall cover thee with His feathers, and under His wings shalt thou trust: His truth shall be thy shield and buckler.
Thou shalt not be afraid for the terror by night; nor for the arrow that flieth by day;
Nor for the pestilence that walketh in darkness; nor for the destruction that wasteth at noonday ...
He shall give His angels charge over thee, to keep thee in all thy ways ...
he shall call upon me, and I will answer him: I will be with him in trouble ... and show him my salvation"
(Psalm 91)

© Elizabeth McDonald     https://www.bayith.org     bayith@blueyonder.co.uk