Bayith Home | Political Cultural and Social Issues | Brexit Home Page
"I have heard their groaning, and am come down to deliver them"
BRINO: Brexit In Name Only
Quotes and Comments
Same Old, Same Old... But Worse... | Tory MPs | The Dimming of Democracy | Britain's Deep State | The Best of Both Worlds
We Shall Survive! | The Battle is Fierce | Liberty: The Battle for the Very Soul of Britain | Norman and Saxon | The Tower of Babel: EU / UN / NWO
Brexit: Legal Challenges: Articles |
Brexit: Main Page
Brexit: YouTubes and Videos
"David Cameron tried to
keep us in the EU and failed when we voted to Leave. The
establishment was horrified and that is why Theresa May (who
campaigned for us to Remain) was swiftly installed as PM. She has
spent the past two years diluting and obfuscating and we now know
that when she said 'Brexit means Brexit' she MEANT 'Brexit in name
"Theresa May - let's
just rename everything, they won't even notice?: Common Rule
Book = Single Market; Combined Customs Territory = Custom Union;
Freedom of Workers = Freedom of Movement"
"The softest of soft
Brexits being proposed is the springboard for a full return to the
EU. it is not enough for May to rename the Single Market (Common
Rule Book) the Customs Union (Combined Customs Territory) and
Freedom of Movement (Freedom of workers, visa free). The humiliation
must deepen as we move to a position of complete re-integration into
the EU. In the meanwhile, we become a vassal state, a simpering rule
taker, subject to the ECJ and compliant to EU policy" [source].
"[W]e will never be able
to wriggle free given that a non-EU member can no longer trigger
Article 50 and say, 'I'm out.' It is the worst of all worlds:
we effectively stay in, we remain beholden to EU diktats, and in
such a way that our ability to push back or rebel is almost
completely diminished. It is not what people voted for. It is the
"People voted to 'take
back control' ... millions voted Leave because they 'didn't want the
EU to have any role in UK law-making'. And now May gives us the
opposite of that. We voted to repair British sovereignty; she acts
to undermine British sovereignty. We voted to strengthen Britain's
democratic independence; she acts to reduce Britain to a rule-taking
vassal state of the increasingly imperial EU"
Common Rule Book:
"[This] means that we
are now fully aligned with the EU and that any future divergence
carries the prospect of 'severe consequences' ... The UK has become
a rule taker for the EU, but without any influence over the EU. This
is the dawning of the vassal state that some have prophesied"
"[T]he prospect of a
free trade deal with the US has receded to the realms of
impossibility since the US has different standards for industrial
goods and agri-food" [source].
Combined Customs Territory:
"It is no longer about a
Hard Brexit or a Soft Brexit, it is now about a Soft Remain versus a
Hard Remain. As evidence of the latter we find the following
pressure now being oh-so-conveniently exerted on this weak
Government by prominent Remain big business cheerleaders. 'A
letter released on Saturday night by the co-founder of Innocent
Drinks, Richard Reed, and signed by the founders of Pret,
Waterstones, Zoopla, Net-a-Porter, Domino's, YO! Sushi and Jack
Wills, among others, said that May's customs proposal would be
costly and bureaucratic for UK firms. They called for MPs to back
amendments to the government's trade and customs bills that would
secure full customs union membership when the legislation is
considered in parliament.' This is where we are now
Freedom of Workers:
"UK and EU citizens can continue to travel to each other's territories, and apply for study and work. No visas required. Borders to the EU will therefore remain effectively open and the number one reason given by voters FOR supporting Brexit - taking back control of borders - is essentially undone" [source].
"[I]n [the 'common
rulebook] the EU writes the rules, but we have to harmonise to them
... Parliament will be under the sword of Damocles... it's illusory
rather than real [power]. It's painting something as returning
sovereignty, returning control to the HofC but in practice, it isn't
doing so" [David Davis, quoted at
"[A] very soft Brexit
means we haven't left, we're simply a rule-taker. That is not
something this country voted for; it's not what the PM promised... I
will certainly stick to the Conservatives' manifesto commitments,
and will not vote for something that doesn't deliver Brexit" [Jacob
Rees-Mogg, quoted at
"[T]his represents a
reneging on only on the referendum vote, but on the very principles
that underpin a democratic society. May is sending a clear signal
with her Chequers capitulation: that she pays more heed to the
Remain-leaning political elite, the business class and the Brussels
bureaucracy than she does to ordinary voters ... she is selling out
the ideals of The Vote itself and the centuries-long struggle to
achieve democratic parity of influence between the wealthy and the
poor, the well-connected and the disconnected, the educated and the
"If 17.4million people
vote for something and it doesn't happen, can Britain make any
serious claim to be a democracy? One leading Remain campaigner says
of the Chequers plan: '(T)his is the biggest win for Remainers since
the referendum.' The losing side is victorious. This is not
how democracy works. We are witnessing the dimming of democracy" [source].
"As things stand, the
next election will present voters with a choice between the useless
and the bonkers. Ever since the departure of Margaret Thatcher, the
Conservative party has been run by ineffective 'leaders' without any
political principles whatsoever, seeking power fro the sole purpose
of doing - what? ... soft socialism, achieving nothing other than
our national decline" [comment at
"If we still ran our politics constitutionally, the government would have abided by the solid vote on the referendum regardless of how some members of the government had felt about it ... The only decent course of action for a truly constitutional government would have been to leave the EU within a couple of weeks of the referendum, and without paying any exit fees. Whatever negotiations were necessary could have proceeded from that starting point. Some economic sacrifices might or might not have followed but, even if they had, they wouldn't have been as severe as those made by the British during Germany's previous attempts to unite Europe. The British government felt then that no sacrifice was too great to preserve the nation's sovereignty and therefore her soul. The British government today is British in name only" [source].
"[A]ll that is
necessary for us to leave the EU is to repeal the European
Communities Act and walk away, but that is a million miles from what
the Tory government is offering, and we must not let them get away
with this treachery ... We must push for a total departure from the
EU, the British people voted for it. We voted for it because we
wanted our country back and we wanted our borders back. We are
getting neither because the EU is calling the shots"
"What happened on 23
June 2016, was a popular revolt against the apparat. The apparat had
permitted it to happen because it had grown so arrogant that a
defeat in the referendum seemed inconceivable ... Do you think for a
second that those Tory Remainers, led with singular ineptitude by
Mrs May, are trying to defeat the referendum they lost because they
don't realise they're destroying the county? Don't they know that
they're practically unrolling a red carpet for the Trotskyist evil
to settle with catastrophic consequences at 10 Downing Street? Of
course they do. But they don't care because their loyalty is pledged
not to the party, nor, God forbid, to the country, but to the
apparat ... They don't care if the Tory party or even Britain
herself dies as long as the apparat lives"
"Don't say we at Traumaville didn't warn you when we pronounced that Brexit would never be allowed to happen. The deep state immediately implemented what Socialists always do when things go against them when they are in power; Over-complication ... Too many Socialist cronies have got too many vested interests in staying in the EU. Also, whatever deal the West has done with Islam relies on Schengen to keep bringing in these hordes who so despise us. And let's not forget the depth of hatred the new Leftist Establishment has for the white working class, who formed the core of the Leave vote ... complete financial collapse is the only cure for the UK and, shackled to the corpse that the EU will soon become, this day can only be hastened in its arrival" [source].
"In 'The Best of Both Worlds' document, David Cameron makes the observation that it doesn't really matter what the outcome of the Referendum is; that he has got a plan for that, and I believe that's exactly what we've seen" [source].
My first thought, when Theresa May was made Prime Minister just after the referendum in June 2016, was that putting a Remainer in charge of Brexit would be like putting the Pope in charge of the Protestant Reformation: It ain't gonna happen...
"To the best of my knowledge no democratic country has ever voluntarily agreed to a treaty in which it agrees that a foreign power may, if it so wishes, overrule that country's laws forever. In a week following the centenary remembrance of the WWI armistice, the UK government has agreed a deal arguable worse for the UK than the Treaty of Versailles was a hundred years ago for Germany ... It was always naive to hope that somebody who campaigned against democracy could be trusted to respect the referendum result. Thanks to Theresa May a strong hand has been deliberately misplayed, taxpayers' money wantonly thrown away, divisions deepened and a precious two and three quarter years to prepare for the future squandered. No doubt the pain and trauma of no deal will be the greater as a result of her Brexit betrayal. There will be more drama ahead in what May has made into an all or nothing game of chicken. True democrats of any party however now have no choice. We must all prepare to crash out of the EU gaol come what may" [source].
"Time wouldn't be running short if we hadn't wasted two years on Oliver Twist-like supplicancy, begging our European masters to be kind, whereas all they want is to punish us, discourage others and, ideally, torpedo Brexit. A PM committed to Brexit, rather than to the warped ruling elite, could have invoked the Royal Prerogative, left immediately after Parliament activated Article 50 - and only then started negotiating 'deals'." [source].
Battle is Fierce, Friends
The following is an extended extract from Battle for the Very Soul of Britain
"Nine hundred and fifty years ago, between two hillocks at Hastings, an Anglo-Saxon king took an arrow in his eye and England surrendered her independence. That was our last - should I say most recent? - defeat on home soil. King Harold's forces fought valiantly but they had been exhausted by two earlier battles ... A shrewd and ruthless Frenchman, Guillaume of Normandy, seized power and London's Witan parliament was never heard of again. ...
"I have been contemplating poor King Harold a fair amount recently. ... As a schoolboy I visited the northern French town of Bayeux to see [the] tapestry and remember a sting of sorrow as I saw the needlework images of vanquished Anglo-Saxons. It was always the same when I read history yarns about British chieftain Caractacus fighting the Romans on his hilltop and later being paraded in Rome as a chained captive; or gallant ... Boadicea, Queen of the Iceni tribe, charging towards the Roman lines in her chariot ... In such accounts, I always rooted for the Brits. ... I always wanted the dwellers of our dank and foggy, sea-set isle to seize the day. Was it a nascent sketchwriter's innate bias or inherited love of country from my fiercely patriotic parents? Was that love wrong? Is that love wrong? I still feel that way.
"The likes of Mr Cameron and his fellow Europhiles ... presumably feel something different when they look at the Bayeux tapestry. I suppose they experience a glow of quiet satisfaction that William and his forces of European integration over came the locals. ... A deep-rooted part of me rebels against that. ... I grieve for the freedoms that were squashed. And I feel just the same when I look at an castle built by English lords to crush dissent in Scottish and Welsh territory. My sympathies lie with the invaded. ...
"Hereward the Wake [a] Lincolnshire freeman ... had his lands taken by the Normans and decided to do something about it. For a few years after 1066, Hereward and his small army operated out of the Cambridgeshire town of Ely, then an island. They were beaten only after a treacherous monk showed the Normans one of the secret paths to Ely through the Fenland marshes. ... Almost a millennium after the event, I feel a lively indignation on Hereward's behalf. What a cur that monk was to betray him. What if Hereward had continued to oppose William? Could he have combined with the still unconquered Celts and Northumbrians to drive out the 'ingengas'? Or was Norman rule as inevitable as supporters of the EU now say their governing body is inevitable? As for that treacherous monk, was he a sort of Roland Rudd of his day ... the City PR smoothie pulling strings for the Remain camp? ...
"My support for Hereward may reflect a surfeit of foolish romanticism. But it may also echo enduring truths about the importance of self-determination and of remaining true to one's ancestral heritage. For what are we if we deny the past? What is the point of being British if we are not able to say who governs us? And let there be no doubt: if we vote to stay ion the EU, we will not be able to dislodge the elite that runs Brussels. They will be impervious to our democratic disapproval. They will be as safe as William and his shaven-headed Normans were in their mighty castle keeps. ...
"The Leave campaign ... has urged voters to quit the EU for a range of reasons ... Hereward the Wake ... would have heard Vote Leave talk of how we must 'take control' and would surely have thought 'I don't really want control - I want liberty.' ...
"It would obviously be good for us to retrieve national control of trade decisions, tax matters, ... immigration policy ... But where is the optimism in Leave's campaign? Where is the appeal to something more positive, more human, more ardent? The hearts of Hereeward the Wake and his 'green men' would have burned for something greater; something more essential. You could call it self-determination or independence but it is basically the right to plant your feet on the clifftops of Kent, raise your eyes to the cloud-scudding sky, and relish your ancient liberty as a free-born Briton. ...
"I think of my grandfathers. One was wounded three times on the Western Front in World War I. The other landed in Normandy - Normandy! - just before D-Day to clear the beaches of mines. They fought for king and country, yes, but they fought most of all for an idea: freedom. The days of ancestral sword and scramasax may have passed but that powerful notion of liberty, the spirit of British dissent which flared so wonderfully in the East Anglian fens 950 years ago, must never be allowed to die. Without it, we would be an island without pride, an island shorn of soul"
[End of Extract]
"'My son,' said the
Norman Baron, 'I am dying, and you will be heir to all the broad
acres in England that William gave me for my share
"The Saxon is not like
us Normans. His manners are not so polite. But he never means
anything serious till he talks about justice and right.
"You can horsewhip your
Gascony archers, or torture your Picardy spears; But don't try that
game on the Saxon; you'll have the whole brood round your ears.
"But first you must
master their language, their dialect, proverbs and songs. Don't
trust any clerk to interpret when they come with the tale of their
"They'll drink every
hour of the daylight and poach every hour of the dark. It's the
sport not the rabbits they're after (we've plenty of game in the
"Appear with your wife
and the children at their weddings and funeral and feasts. Be polite
but not friendly to Bishops; be good to all poor parish priests.
[Poem by Rudyard Kipling]
"These are the families of the sons of Noah, after their generations, in their nations: and by these were the nations divided in the earth after the flood. And the whole earth was of one language, and of one speech. And it came to pass, as they journeyed from the east, that they found a plain in the land of Shinar; and they dwelt there. And they said one to another, Go to, let us make brick, and burn them thoroughly. And they had brick for stone, and slime had they for mortar. And they said, Go to, let us build us a city and a tower, whose top may reach unto heaven; and let us make us a name, lest we be scattered abroad upon the face of the whole earth. And the LORD came down to see the city and the tower, which the children of men builded. And the LORD said, Behold, the people is one, and they have all one language; and this they begin to do: and now nothing will be restrained from them, which they have imagined to do. Go to, let us go down, and there confound their language, that they may not understand one another's speech. So the LORD scattered them abroad from thence upon the face of all the earth: and they left off to build the city. Therefore is the name of it called Babel; because the LORD did there confound the language of all the earth: and from thence did the LORD scatter them abroad upon the face of all the earth" (Genesis 10:32-11:9).
"The Queen's Majesty hath the chief
power in this realm of England and other her dominions, unto whom
the chief government of all estates in this realm,
"And I do declare that no
Foreign Prince Person Prelate, State or Potentate hath or ought to have any
"Parliament voted to put the decision about our membership of the EU in the hands
of the British people.
"June 23rd 2016 was the
day the people of the UK voted to LEAVE the EU in the single biggest expression
of our will in British history.